Support us | Visit us | Contact us
© Odra Noel
Organised by Dr Nick Lane, Professor John Allen, Professor William Martin and Professor John Raven FRS
Living organisms are self-replicating, self-sustaining dynamic systems. Newly emerging insights into the interdependence of bioenergetics and genome function have far-reaching implications for diverse fields, from the origin of life to genomic complexity, from multicellular differentiation to ageing. This meeting brings together major contributors from diverse disciplines, with the objective of driving an evolutionary synthesis that is rooted in thermodynamics.
Biographies of the organisers and speakers are available below and you can also download the programme (PDF). Recorded audio of the presentations are available by clicking on the speakers names below and papers will be published in a future issue of Philosophical Transactions B.
Contact the events team
Dr Nick Lane, University College LondonOrganiser and Chair of Session 1
Dr Nick Lane is a biochemist and writer. He holds the first Provost's Venture Research Fellowship in the Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment at University College London. His research is on evolutionary biochemistry and bioenergetics, focusing on the origin of life, and the origin and evolution of eukaryotes. Dr Lane was a founding member of the UCL Consortium for Mitochondrial Research, and is leading the UCL Research Frontiers Origins of Life programme. He is the author of three acclaimed books on evolutionary biochemistry, the most recent of which, Life Ascending, won the 2010 Royal Society Winton Prize for Science Books.
Professor William Martin, Heinrich-Heine UniversityOrganiser and Chair of Session 2
Bill Martin received his undergraduate degree in Biology at the University of Hannover in 1985 and completed his PhD in Genetics with Heinz Saedler at the Max Planck Institute for Breeding Research in Cologne in 1988. He pursued postdoctoral research with Rüdiger Cerff at the University of Braunschweig on the origins and evolution of eukaryotes and their bioenergetic organelles (chloroplasts and mitochondria). In 1999 he accepted the position of full professor at the University of Düsseldorf. His biochemical work focusses on energy metabolism in eukaryotic anaerobes and the role of hydrogenosomes — hydrogen-producing forms of mitochondria — therein. His genome evolutionary work focusses on non-treelike evolutionary processes such as gene transfers from organelles to the nucleus (endosymbiotic gene transfer) and lateral gene transfer among prokaryotes, the study of which incorporates networks to recover the vertical and the horizontal components of genome evolution.
Professor John Raven FRS, University of DundeeOrganiser and Chair of Session 3
John Raven graduated from Cambidge University with a BA in Botany in 1963 and a PhD in Botany in 1967. After Fellowships at St John's College and a temporary lectureship in Camridge he moved to the University of Dundee in 1971 and became a Professor there in 1980. He has published widely on bioenergetics, biological transport processes, biogeochemistry, ecophysiogy, palaeoecology, astrobiology and evolution with over 350 peer-reviewed publications. He was elected FRSE in 1981 and FRS in 1990 and has been involved in organising three previous Royal Society Discussion Meetings.
Professor John Allen, Queen Mary University LondonOrganiser and Chair of Session 4
John F. Allen is Professor of Biochemistry at Queen Mary, University of London. A native of Newport, Monmouthshire, Allen obtained his BSc and PhD (with D. O. Hall) from King's College, University of London. Allen pursued postdoctoral research in Oxford, in the laboratory of F. R. Whatley FRS; then in Warwick, with J. Bennett, in the Chloroplast Laboratory of R. J. Ellis FRS, also working in Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, with C. J. Arntzen. As a lecturer in Leeds University, Allen did sabbatical work the laboratory of K. Sauer, University of California, Berkeley. Allen became a professor at the universities of Oslo, Norway (1990-92), and Lund, Sweden (1992-2005). At Queen Mary from 2005, Allen held a Royal Society-Wolfson Research Merit Award, and Fellowship of the Linnean Society of London from 2009. Allen's contributions include demonstration of superoxide in photosynthetic oxygen reduction, redox control of protein phosphorylation, regulation of light-harvesting structure and function, and transcription of chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA. Allen’s CoRR Hypothesis for the evolution and function of cytoplasmic genomes led to the discovery of Chloroplast Sensor Kinase and makes further predictions concerning the dialogue between bioenergetics and gene expression.
Dr Michael Russell, JPL, California Institute of TechnologyOn the inevitable journey to being
Life is the evolutionary culmination of emergent symmetry-breaking, macroscopically organized dynamic structures in the universe. Members of this cascading series of autocatalytic energy converting systems, or engines in Cottrell’s terminology, become ever more complex—more chemical and less physical—as each engine extracts, exploits and generates ever lower grades of energy and resources in the service of entropy generation. Each one of these engines emerges spontaneously from order created by a particular mother engine or engines as the disequilibrated potential daughter is driven beyond a critical point, as in e.g., the transition to thermonuclear reactions during gravitationally-driven star formation; the transition to convective flow in systems driven beyond the Rayleigh limit by thermal gradients (such as those responsible for the tectonic dynamics of our planet); and the onset of Mohr-Coulomb failure and fracture propagation due to differential mechanical stress exceeding rock strength (as occurs in the planet's tectonically-strained ocean floor rock). Importantly, it is these fractures in the ocean floor, acting themselves as engines of dissipation, that allow ocean water access to the crust which in turn drives the onset of exothermic serpentinization, alkaline hydrothermal convection and thereby the spontaneous production of precipitated submarine hydrothermal mounds. It is at such mounds finally that, we argue, the two chemical disequilibria directly causative in the emergence of life spontaneously arose across the mineral precipitate membranes separating the acidulous, nitrate-bearing CO2-rich, Hadean sea from the alkaline and CH4/H2-rich serpentine-generated effluents. The first and foremost of these great geochemical gifts was the imposition of essential redox gradients involving hydrothermal CH4 and H2 as electron donors, and CO2 and nitrate, nitrite, and ferric iron from the ambient ocean as acceptors; which gradients, we propose, functioned as the original “carbon-fixing engine”. The second gift, also imposed across the inorganic membrane, was a post-critical-point (milli)voltage pH potential (proton concentration gradient) that, we hypothesize, drove the condensation of orthophosphate to produce a high energy currency:- “the pyrophosphatase engine”. Notably, of course, this specific ionic gradient, there available for the taking, is one upon which all extant cellular systems now depend even though they must constantly recreate it on their own through the harnessing of redox gradients, or the catabolism of biomolecules such as glucose, to recondense ADP to ATP. Once metabolizing cells emerged and evolved in this submarine mound, the call for constant and far-from-equilibrium free energy sources presumably diminished somewhat due to the relative stability, and “templating effect” of the relatively stable organized states of matter mediating the key steps of proto-life free energy conversion. Thus the metabolic engines could sustain themselves by merely “ticking over” during times of deprivation and in this way more robustly survive for the long periods that life occupied the ocean floor and deep biosphere before its escape to the wider and more free-energy rich world and, ultimately, its “discovery” of photosynthesis.
Dr Michael Russell is a Research Scientist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology where he is testing his theory on the emergence of life. His life has come full circle from his first job as a works chemist in East London, testing the activity of nickel catalysts for organic synthesis. He then attended the University of London, studying geology, chemistry and physics. From London he was posted to the Solomon Islands Geological Survey to search for submarine hot springs and explore for mineral deposits. He continued this latter activity in Canada before returning to the University of Durham in the UK to undertake research on the newly discovered giant mineral deposits in Ireland. Thereafter he joined the staff at the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow, Scotland, while continuing his research in Ireland—research that led to his theorizing into the emergence of life at submarine springs. He transferred to the University of Glasgow in 1990 and to JPL in 2006. In June 2009 he was awarded the William Smith Medal from the Geological Society of London for his lifetime contribution to applied geology.
Professor Jan Amend, University of Southern CaliforniaThe energetics of organic synthesis inside and outside the cell
Thermodynamic modeling of organic synthesis has largely been focused on deep-sea hydrothermal systems. When seawater mixes with hydrothermal fluids, redox gradients are established that serve as potential energy sources for the formation of organic compounds and biomolecules from inorganic starting materials. This energetic drive, which varies substantially depending on the type of host rock, is present and available both for abiotic (outside the cell) and biotic (inside the cell) processes. Here, we review and synthesize a library of theoretical studies that target organic synthesis energetics. The biogeochemical scenarios evaluated include those in present-day hydrothermal systems and in putative early Earth environments. It is consistently and repeatedly shown in these studies that the formation of relatively simple organic compounds and biomolecules can be energy-yielding (exergonic) at conditions that occur in hydrothermal systems. Expanding on our ability to calculate biomass synthesis energetics, we also present here a new approach for estimating the energetics of polymerization reactions, specifically those associated with polypeptide formation from the requisite amino acids.
Jan Amend is a Professor of Microbial Geochemistry in the Departments of Earth Sciences and Biological Sciences at the University of Southern California. He earned his Ph.D. in 1995 from the University of California, Berkeley under the mentorship of Harold Helgeson. After post-doctoral fellowships with John Baross (University of Washington) and Everett Shock (Washington University), Amend joined the faculty of the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences at Washington University. There, he was Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Director of the Environmental Studies Program until his move to Los Angeles in 2011. Amend’s research combines field work in hydrothermal systems, theoretical geochemistry, and laboratory experimentation in attempts to better understand the microbiology/geochemistry interface. Of particular interests are the energetics of microbial metabolism in extreme environments, the deep subsurface biosphere, microbial community structures and metabolic activity in shallow-sea hydrothermal systems, cultivation of novel thermophilic archaea and bacteria, environmental microbiology of arsenic, and life detection with a focus on astrobiology.
Professor William Martin, Heinrich-Heine University The early evolution of biological energy conservation: hydrogen, metals, gradients and electron bifurcation
In very early chemical evolution, the forerunners of carbon and energy metabolism were the processes of generating reduced carbon compounds from carbon dioxide and the mechanisms of harnessing energy as compounds capable of doing some chemical work. New insights into energy conservation in methanogens and acetogens — cells that fuel both their carbon and energy metabolism through the CO2/H2 redox couple — suggest that reduced ferredoxin is the most ancient biological energy currency. Those anaerobic autotrophs generate reduced ferredoxin from H2 via a mechanism called electron bifurcation, a process that in turn links ferredoxin reduction to exergonic reactions and the generation of transmembrane ion gradients. Overall carbon and energy metabolsm in methanogens and acetogens that lack cytochromes and quinones (or the quinone analogue methanophenazine) involves Ech and Rnf complexes that pump ions while reducing protons and NAD+, respectively, with electrons from ferredoxin. This has some similarity to serpentinization, a geochemical process in which electons from Fe2+ generate H2 and reduced carbon compounds such as methane. The new findings from microbial physiology are remarkably congruent with the independently derived idea that life evolved in submarine alkaline hydrothermal vents and underscore evolutionarily significant similarities as well as differences in acetogen and methanogen physiology.
Professor Wolfgang Nitschke, CNRS MarseillesA reassessment of autotrophy at the emergence of life
An empirical way to study the origin of life is through extrapolating the evolutionary history of extant life back towards its very beginning while respecting geochemical boundary conditions and fundamental physical laws. This approach has in the past identified the Wood-Ljungdahl (WL) pathway of aceto- and methanogens as a promising candidate for primordial energy and carbon metabolism. However, a number of problems with this scenario have recently been pointed out (Schoepp et al., 2012, Biochim.Biophys.Acta, doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.09.005) suggesting that the original model may require amendments and reinterpretations. Here we present a scenario which stipulates that methane and nitrogen oxyanions ought to be considered in addition to the canonical WL-substrates, H2 and CO2. The recently described denitrifying methanotrophs represent an extant example for a corresponding metabolism. We will present arguments suggesting that denitrifying methanotrophy may pre-date aceto- and methanogenesis. Extant methanotrophic pathways suggest that the earliest carbon-fixing and energy harvesting metabolism may have condensed CO (delivered by the Ni/Fe-catalysed reduction of CO2) and a second C1-body represented by formaldehyde (or a sulphur-associated methyl group) produced by monooxygenation of methane to methanol (at a diiron centre) followed by further oxidation to formaldehyde (possibly catalysed by a molybdenum/tungsten-sulphide). In both half-reactions, redox bifurcations play crucial roles.
Following a Master’s degree in Physics Wolfgang Nitschke obtained his PhD in Biochemistry and Biophysics from the University of Regensburg/Germany in 1987. He then spent periods of post-doctoral research at the CEA in Saclay/France, the Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique in Paris/France and the University of Freiburg/Germany. He has been at the Laboratoire de Bioénergétique et Ingénierie des Protéines (CNRS) in Marseilles/France since 1995 and is presently leading the research group "Evolution of Bioenergetics" at the institute. Their research topic aims to elucidate the evolutionary pathways of specific bioenergetic electron transfer chains through the last 4 billion years of life on Earth, i.e. from the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) to extant organisms.
Professor Paul Falkowski, Rutgers UniversityDiscovering the electronic circuit diagram of life
Life is far from thermodynamic equilibrium. Over the past decade, together with his collaborators, Professor Falkowski has been analyzing the biochemical reactions responsible for energy generation in all organisms, and they have identified a set of ~1500 “core” genes which encode for the energy transduction systems on a planetary scale. He will examine the evolutionary trajectory of these core reactions, culminating in the splitting of water by light and the use of oxygen as a terminal electron acceptor by aerobic microbes. These two, and fifteen other processes, form a global electronic circuit, where individual organisms essentially are transistors on a planetary circuit board. The wires are the two primary geophysical fluids: the ocean and the atmosphere. The primary power supply is solar energy. The output is a self-replicating system that decreases entropy at the cost of increased energy dissipation; a condition that is not amenable to classical Boltzmann functions. The system has a limited number of transistor designs. They have identified 35 basic structural elements, which appear to have a single common ancestor with a core Fe4S4 motif. They are attempting to develop a phylogeny of the core motifs in an effort to understand the evolution of biologically catalyzed redox reactions.
Paul G. Falkowski is the Bennett L. Smith Chair in Business and Natural Resources, a Board of Governors’ Professor in the Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences and the Department of Earth and Planetary Science at Rutgers University, and the founding Director of the Rutgers Energy Institute. His scientific interests include evolution, paleoecology, photosynthesis, biophysics, biogeochemical cycles, and symbiosis. His current research efforts are directed towards understanding the co-evolution of biological and physical systems. Dr. Falkowski earned his B.S. and M.Sc. degrees from the City College of the City University of New York and his Ph.D. from the University of British Columbia. After a post-doctoral fellowship at the University of Rhode Island, he joined Brookhaven National Laboratory in 1976 as a scientist in the newly formed Oceanographic Sciences Division. He served as head of the division from 1986 to 1991 and deputy chair in the Department of Applied Science from 1991-1995, responsible for the development and oversight of all environmental science programs. In 1996, he was appointed as the Cecil and Ida Green Distinguished Professor at the University of British Columbia. He moved to Rutgers University in 1998. He received a John Simon Guggenheim Fellowship in 1992; the Huntsman Medal in 1998; the Hutchinson Prize in 2000; the Vernadsky medal from the European Geosciences Union in 2007; the Ecology Institute Prize in Marine Ecology in 2010; and the Prince Albert 1ER of Monaco Commemorative Medal in 2010. In 2001, he was elected a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union; in 2002, he was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences; in 2007, he was elected to the National Academy of Sciences; in 2008, he was elected as a Fellow of the American Academy of Microbiology; and in 2010, he was elected to the National Academy of Sciences Governing Council.
Professor Jennifer Macalady, Penn State UniversityEnergy, ecology, and the distribution of microbial life
We are fundamentally interested in what controls the distribution of microbial life in space and time. In ecological terms, this amounts to understanding the relationship between microbial populations and environmental conditions (niches). Understood quantitatively, niches unlock our ability to interpret the signatures of life recorded in rocks and empower the use of microbial genetic potential for engineering applications of all types. In this contribution we will focus on niches related to energy metabolism because of direct links to elemental cycling, engineering, and astrobiology. To what degree does niche differentiation related to energy metabolism drive microbial diversity and evolution? Although microbiologists are well aware of large-scale taxonomic patterns in energy-harvesting metabolisms (e.g. oxygenic phototrophy in cyanobacteria, sulfate reduction in deltaproteobacteria), we live in profound ignorance of the quantitative niches inhabited by most microorganisms alive today. Our recent work suggests that relatively subtle variations in the concentration ratios of external electron donors and acceptors are sufficient to select for new populations, and that quantitative knowledge of microbial niches can be used to predict the abundance of specific microbial taxa in a landscape of environmental variations. These results are reviewed in the context of resource ratio theory, which predicts the outcome of competition among plant species sharing limiting resources. We then identify challenges to the view that niches related to energy transduction organise microbial populations in space and time. Lastly, we evaluate the prospect that a focus on testing ecological theory will transform our awe-struck collective gaze at the microbial constellations into a predictive science in time to participate in the grand challenges we face as planetary engineers.
Professor Jennifer (Jenn) Macalady is an Associate Professor and Geomicrobiologist in the Department of Geosciences at the Pennsylvania State University, where she studies microbial life in Precambrian-analog environments. She earned her undergraduate degree in Geology from Carleton College in 1991, and her Ph.D. in Soil Microbiology with Kate Scow at University of California Davis in 2000. She pursued postdoctoral research at the University of California Berkeley under the mentorship of Jillian Banfield, and briefly returned to Carleton College as a Visiting Assistant Professor in 2002. She accepted a permanent position at Penn State in 2004, where she serves as Director of the Center for Environmental Geochemistry and Genomics, Faculty-in-charge of the Graduate Program in Biogeochemistry, and Member of the Penn State Astrobiology Research Center. Her research is focused on the microbial ecology of sulfur-rich, oxygen-poor ecosystems. She can often be found underground in the deep and sulfidic Frasassi cave system, Italy, or with cave divers exploring inland blue holes and stratified aquifers in the Caribbean. Her group aims to discover ecological rules and genomic constraints governing how microbial populations distribute themselves into environmental niches, with an eye toward how geochemistry influences biosignatures preserved in Earth's geologic record and potentially on other planets.
Professor John Raven FRS, Univesity of DundeeThe influence of photosynthesis on genome function
Photolithotrophic organisms may be divided into those which use an electron donor other than water (the anoxygenic photolithotrophs, all of which are bacteria) and those which use water as the electron donor (including the cyanobacteria and the photosynthetic eukaryotes). Those photolithotrophic organisms with the most reduced genomes have more genes than do the chemoorganotrophs with the most reduced genomes, and the fastest-growing chemoorganotrophs have significantly higher specific growth rates than the fastest-growing photolithotrophs. This slower growth of photosynthetic organisms apparently results from diversion of resources into the photosynthetic apparatus which account for half of the cell protein. The inherent dangers in photosynthesis (and especially oxygenic photosynthesis), including the formation of reactive oxygen species, can damage the cell and especially the photosynthetic apparatus. The extent to which protective measures in photolithotrophs fail and involve greater DNA damage and repair and faster protein turnover, with implications for energetics and rRNA expression, than in chemoorganotrophs, will be discussed, as will possible implications for the location of genes within the eukaryotic cell. A related source of environmental damage is UVB radiation, whose flux at the Earth’s surface decreased as oxygen (and ozone) increased in the atmosphere; possible relict UV avoidance and repair mechanisms from the times of higher UV fluxes will be discussed. Local, and then global, oxygenation led to the much discussed requirements of defence against reactive oxygen species and the opportunity for aerobic respiration for organisms in the oxygenated habitats. However, there are also effects on the nitrogen, phosphorus and iron cycles which decrease the availability to organisms of combined (non-dinitrogen) nitrogen, phosphorus and ferrous iron in the oxygenated biosphere. The implications of the decreased availability of nutrient elements for evolution of novel pathways related to enhancing the availability of these elements, and/or decreasing the requirement for them, will be discussed. Finally, we consider evidence from codon usage of economies in the use of potentially growth-limiting elements in the genome and, especially, the proteome.
Dr Sujith Puthiyaveetil, Washington State UniversityHow evolutionary tinkering rewires chloroplast gene regulation
Chloroplasts are the sites of photosynthesis in plants and algae. True to their symbiotic origin from cyanobacteria, chloroplasts contain genes encoding some of the core proteins of the two photosystems. The expression of these chloroplast genes is regulated by photosynthetic electron transport through a bacterial-type sensor kinase known as Chloroplast Sensor Kinase (CSK). CSK represses the transcription of photosystem I (PS I) genes in PS I light condition, thus explaining the acclimatory process of photosystem stoichiometry adjustment. Here we show that overexpression of CSK induces a shade avoidance phenotype, consistent with its function in low light acclimation. In cyanobacteria and in non-green algae, CSK homologues co-exist with their response regulator partners in canonical bacterial two-component systems. In green algae and plants, however, no response regulator partner of CSK is found. Yeast two-hybrid analysis reveals interaction of CSK with the sigma factor subunit (SIG1) of the eubacterial chloroplast RNA polymerase. Here we present further evidence for the interactions of CSK and SIG1, using in vitro pull-down assays. We also show that CSK interacts with quinone. SIG1 becomes phosphorylated in PS I light, and then specifically represses transcription of PS I genes. In view of the identical signalling properties of CSK and SIG1 and of their interaction, we suggest that CSK is the SIG1 kinase. Here we also propose that the selective repression of PS I genes arises from the operation of a gene-regulatory phosphoswitch in SIG1. Evolution has rewired a two-component regulatory system into a novel chloroplast signalling pathway by tinkering with a sensor histidine kinase and a sigma factor, with phosphorylation still kept as the basis of signal transduction. The CSK-SIG1 regulatory system strongly supports a proposal for the selection pressure behind the evolutionary stasis of chloroplast genes.
Sujith Puthiyaveetil was until recently a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Research Fellow at Queen Mary, University of London. After completing a Master’s degree in Botany from Kannur University, Kerala, Puthiyaveetil moved to Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi to work with Prof. Baishnab Charan Tripathy as a junior research fellow. He then moved to Lund University, Sweden, and on to Queen Mary, University of London, where he completed his PhD in 2008 under the supervision of Prof. John F. Allen. In his PhD research, Puthiyaveetil discovered Chloroplast Sensor Kinase (CSK), a bacterial-type sensor histidine kinase that couples photosynthesis with gene expression in chloroplasts. The discovery of CSK has implications for understanding the evolutionary retention of genes in chloroplasts, for chloroplast gene regulation and for light acclimation. Puthiyaveetil’s latest research proposes and provides evidence for a complete signaling pathway for photosystem stoichiometry adjustment in photosynthesis. His current research interests include genetic and metabolic control of photosynthesis. Puthiyaveetil moved to a postdoctoral position in Washington State University in the autumn of 2012.
Dr Leonid Sazanov, MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit
Dr. Leonid Sazanov is a Programme Leader at the Medical Research Council Mitochondrial Biology Unit in Cambridge, UK. He gained a PhD in Biophysics from Moscow State University, Russia, in 1990. He was a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Birmingham and at Imperial College, London. He moved to the MRC LMB in Cambridge in 1997 and became a group leader in MRC MBU in 2000. His research is focused on the structure and function of membrane proteins, such as complex I from respiratory chains in mitochondria and bacteria, as well as mitochondrial proton-translocating transhydrogenase. Complex I is central to bioenergetics and is one of the largest membrane protein assemblies known. Dr. Sazanov’ group has solved the first and so far the only atomic structures of the hydrophilic and membrane domains of complex I, as well as determined the architecture of the entire enzyme, containing 9 iron-sulfur clusters and 64 transmembrane helices.
NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I) is the first and the largest enzyme in the respiratory chain of mitochondria and most bacteria. Complex I is central to bioenergetics and is implicated in many human neurodegenerative diseases, as well as in aging. It couples electron transfer between NADH and ubiquinone to proton translocation across the membrane. It is an L-shaped assembly, with the hydrophobic arm embedded in the membrane and the hydrophilic arm protruding into the bacterial cytoplasm or mitochondrial matrix. Bacterial enzyme usually consists of 14 conserved core subunits, whilst mitochondrial complex contains also about 30 “accessory” subunits, bringing its total molecular mass to 1 MDa. We have recently shown that, unexpectedly, complex I from the alpha-proteobacterium Paracoccus denitrificans, a close relative of the “proto-mitochondrion”, contains three “accessory” subunits. This suggests that evolution of complex I via addition of subunits started before the original endosymbiotic event that led to the creation of the eukaryotic cell. We study bacterial complex I as a “minimal” structural model of human enzyme. We have determined the crystal structure of the hydrophilic domain of complex I from Thermus thermophilus, revealing the arrangement of NADH, flavin and nine Fe-S clusters. The structure shows how eight different subunits, related to various smaller redox proteins, were combined during evolution to provide a uniquely long (95 angstrom) electron transfer chain. Recently, we have determined the structure of the membrane domain of complex I from E. coli. We have also described the low-resolution architecture of the entire complex I from T. thermophilus. Three largest subunits of the membrane domain are related to each other and to the family of Mrp Na+/H+ antiporters. The structures show that each antiporter-like subunit contains a single proton translocation channel formed by two connected half-channels. Complex I-like family of enzymes includes membrane-bound hydrogenases and probably originated from the unification of soluble hydrogenases and Mrp-type antiporters. The mechanism of coupling between the electron transfer in the hydrophilic domain and proton translocation in the membrane domain of complex I is not yet established. The antiporter-like subunits are well separated from the quinone-binding site, implying that long-range conformational changes must play a role in coupling. The structures suggest that two coupling elements, including the unusual long amphipathic alpha-helix, likely help coordinate conformational changes in the membrane domain, driven by redox reactions near the quinone-binding site.
Professor Carl Bauer, Indiana UniversityEvolutionary and regulatory aspects of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis
The tetrapyrrole biosynthetic pathway is responsible for synthesizing heme, cobalamin (vitamin B12) and chlorophyll. These cofactors are responsible many important biological processes such as photosynthesis, respiration and enzyme substrate modification. Chlorophyll synthesis provides photosynthetic organisms the ability to convert solar energy into cellular energy and to produce atmospheric oxygen as a byproduct of this energy conversion. Life on Earth would be vastly different without this capability. Heme synthesis is responsible for the ability of cells to shuttle electrons from energy generating to energy utilizing processes as well as to function as a gas carrier and a gas sensor. Respiration is clearly dependent on these features of heme. Cobalamin is an essential vitamin in many organisms and is used by enzymes to provide a facile way of performing methylationreactions. Over the years our laboratory has investigated many properties of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis, from the discovery of the genes involved in synthesis of chlorophyll, to transcriptional control of enzyme involved in all three branches of this biosynthetic pathway. This later feature, transcriptional control of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis with transcription factors that utilize tetrapyrrols as cofactors will be discussed.
Professor Carl Bauer is a Chairman and Professor of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry at Indiana University. Over the past three decades he has published over 130 manuscripts on various aspects of microbial photosynthesis. His work has involved studies on the origin and evolution of photosynthesis as well as how photosynthetic microorganisms regulate the synthesis of the photosystem in response to changes in redox tension and light intensity. Professor Bauer is Fellow of the Microbiology Society and a Fellow of the American Academy of Science.
Dr Janneke Balk, University of East AngliaThe role of mitochondria in the maintenance of nuclear DNA
An important function of mitochondria and chloroplasts, two types of organelles from endosymbiotic origin, is the assembly of iron-sulphur (Fe-S) clusters. These metal cofactors function as versatile catalysts in many essential enzymes. In our studies using the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, we have found that mitochondria, but not the chloroplasts, contribute to the maturation of Fe-S proteins in the cytosol and nucleus. The proteins involved in this process are highly conserved from yeast to mammals to plants, and include an ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter of the mitochondria, as well as 7 – 8 proteins of the Cytosolic Iron-sulphur cluster Assembly (CIA) pathway. Recently we found that Arabidopsis mutants in the ABC transporter or in one of the CIA genes have increased DNA breakage and recombination. Together with similar findings in yeast and mammals, the results link mitochondria to nuclear genome integrity through assembly of Fe-S proteins.
Janneke Balk did her PhD at the University of Oxford on the role of mitochondria in flower development, with Professor Chris Leaver. They showed how recombination of the mitochondrial DNA led to a subtle defect in the function of FoF1-ATPase, leading to programmed cell death and male sterility in crop plants. She was a Marie Curie post-doctoral fellow in the laboratory of Professor Roland Lill, Philipps-Universty Marburg, and discovered a number of proteins involved in Fe-S protein biogensis. Since 2004 she has held a Royal Society University Research Fellowship to investigate Fe-S protein assembly pathways, in particular their compartmentalization and evolution, in plants and algae. After 7 years at the University of Cambridge, she has recently moved to the John Innes Centre/ University of East Anglia as a Group Leader and lecturer, where she will continue her research on metal proteins and bio-energetics in plant-microbe interactions.
Professor John Allen, Queen Mary University LondonEnergy, fidelity and sex. Oocyte mitochondrial DNA as a protected genetic template
Oxidative phosphorylation couples ATP synthesis to respiratory electron transport. In eukaryotes, this coupling occurs in mitochondria, which carry DNA. Respiratory electron transport in the presence of molecular oxygen generates mutagenic free radicals at a frequency that is itself increased by mutation. Damage to mitochondrial DNA therefore accumulates within the life-span of individual organisms. Syngamy requires motility of one gamete, and this motility requires ATP. We propose that oxidative phosphorylation is absent in the special case of quiescent, template mitochondria, and that these remain sequestered in oocytes and female germ lines. Oocyte mitochondrial DNA is thus protected from damage. Here we present evidence that female gametes, which are immotile, repress mitochondrial DNA transcription, electron transport, and free radical production. In contrast, somatic cells and male gametes are seen actively to transcribe mitochondrial genes for respiratory electron carriers, and to produce oxygen free radicals. We find that this functional division of labour between sperm and egg is widely distributed within the animal kingdom, and characterised by contrasting mitochondrial size and morphology. We suggest that mitochondrial anisogamy explains the occurrence of two sexes. If quiescent oocyte mitochondria alone retain the capacity for an indefinite number of accurate replications of mitochondrial DNA, then "female" can be defined as that sex which transmits genetic template mitochondria. Template mitochondria then give rise to mitochondria that perform oxidative phosphorylation in somatic cells and in male gametes of each new generation. Template mitochondria also persist within the female germ line, to populate the oocytes of daughters. Thus mitochondria are maternally inherited.
Dr Nick Lane, University College LondonOn the singular origin of eukaryotes
The eukaryotes are monophyletic and share a common ancestor that by definition only arose once. But singularities are common in evolution and do not necessarily imply an improbable event. I shall argue that the origin of eukaryotes was genuinely improbable, for bioenergetic reasons. Prokaryotes depend on plasma membrane potential for ATP synthesis. Membrane bioenergetics limits energy availability per gene in prokaryotes, which show no tendency to evolve genomic or morphological complexity. On the contrary: genomic and morphological streamlining maximises prokaryotic energy per gene and replication speed. Eukaryotes almost certainly arose in a rare endosymbiosis between two prokaryotes, an archaeal host cell and a bacterial endosymbiont, the ancestor of mitochondria. The genetic configuration of bioenergetic membranes in eukaryotes with mitochondria differs from that in prokaryotes with invaginated plasma membranes in that mitochondrial membranes are associated only with the genes specifically required for ATP synthesis. Loss of other endosymbiont genes and bioenergetic specialization supported, energetically, orders of magnitude more DNA in the host cell. This allowed gene families to expand and explore sequence space in a manner that cannot be realized in prokaryotes. While rare in prokaryotes, endosymbiosis is not rare enough to account for a genuinely singular event over four billion years of evolution. Yet the integration of prokaryotic host with endosymbiont is fraught with difficulties, producing a restrictive bottleneck. Many basal eukaryotic traits might be explained in terms of the dynamics of a prokaryote with endosymbionts, including the nucleus, sex, two sexes, sensescence and speciation. A requirement for sex and recombination on a genome-wide scale in eukaryotes may have acted as a restrictive bottleneck preceding the big-bang radiation of eukaryotic supergroups.
Dr Nick Lane is a biochemist and writer. He holds the first Provost's Venture Research Fellowship in the Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment at University College London. His research is on evolutionary biochemistry and bioenergetics, focusing on the origin of life, and the origin and evolution of eukaryotes. Dr Lane was a founding member of the UCL Consortium for Mitochondrial Research, and is leading the UCL Research Frontiers Origins of Life programme. He is the author of three acclaimed books on evolutionary biochemistry, the most recent of which, Life Ascending, won the 2010 Royal Society Prize for Science Books.
Professor Neil Blackstone, Northern Illinois UniversityWhy did eukaryotes evolve only once? - genetic and energetic aspects of conflict and conflict mediation
According to multi-level theory, evolutionary transitions require mediating conflicts between lower-level units in favor of the higher-level unit. By this view, the origin of eukaryotes and the origin of multicellularity would seem largely equivalent. Yet eukaryotes evolved only once in the history of life, while multicellular eukaryotes have evolved many times. Examining conflicts between evolutionary units and mechanisms that mediate these conflicts can illuminate these differences. Energy-converting endosymbionts that allow eukaryotes to transcend surface-to-volume constraints also can allocate energy into their own selfish replication. This principal conflict in the origin of eukaryotes can be mediated by genetic or energetic mechanisms. Genome transfer diminishes the heritable variation of the symbiont, but requires the de novo evolution of protein-import apparatus and was opposed by selection for selfish symbionts. In contrast, metabolic signaling is a shared primitive feature of all cells. Redox state of the cytosol is an emergent feature that cannot be subverted by an individual symbiont. Hypothetical scenarios illustrate how metabolic regulation may have mediated the conflicts inherent at different stages in the origin of eukaryotes. Aspects of metabolic regulation may have subsequently been co-opted from within-cell to between-cell pathways, allowing multicellularity to emerge repeatedly.
Neil Blackstone received his Ph.D. from Yale University in 1985. Early studies of carcinization in hermit crabs led to work on the colonial marine hydroids that encrust the hermit crab’s shell. A postdoc with Dr. Leo Buss solidified these interests and cast them in a levels-of-selection framework. At Northern Illinois University since 1993, Dr Blackstone continues to focus on (1) the regulation of hydroid colony growth and form by the redox state of groups of mitochondrion-rich cells, (2) within-colony migration of photosynthetic dinoflagellate symbionts in octocorals during perturbation and subsequent bleaching, (3) levels-of-selection transitions in the history of life, particularly the origins of eukaryotes and multicellularity.
Sir Salvador Moncada FRS, University College LondonMitochondria, not just for energy
Mitochondria play an important role in cell proliferation by ensuring that substrates are provided for macromolecular synthesis via acceleration of the TCA cycle. We have shown that the activity of key metabolic enzymes is regulated by the ubiquitin ligases that control the function of the cyclins. Thus, anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C)-Cdh1, which controls G1- to-S-phase transition by targeting specific degradation motifs in cell cycle proteins, also regulates the glycolysis-promoting enzyme 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase isoform 3 (PFKFB3) and glutaminase 1 (GLS1), a critical enzyme in glycolysis. A decrease in the activity of APC/C-Cdh1 in mid-to-late G1 releases both proteins, thus explaining the simultaneous increase in the utilization of glucose and glutamine during cell proliferation. A second ubiquitin ligase (SCF(Skp1/CUL-1/F-box protein)-b-TrCP) degrades PFKFB3 during late G1/S so that the upregulation of glycolysis is tightly controlled at a specific point in G1 whereas the activity of GLSI remains high throughout S-phase.
Salvador Moncada, MD, obtained his PhD in 1973 at the Royal College of Surgeons in London. He then moved to the Wellcome Research Laboratories where he initiated the work leading to the discovery of the enzyme thromboxane synthase and the vasodilator prostacyclin. He was also responsible for the identification of nitric oxide as a biological mediator and the elucidation of the metabolic pathway leading to its synthesis. Since 1996 Professor Moncada has directed the Wolfson Institute for Biomedical Research at University College London. He continued his research in the areas of mitochondrial biology and cell metabolism where he made significant contributions. His current research is concentrated in the area of cell proliferation. Professor Moncada is a Fellow of the Royal Society and a Foreign Associate of the National Academy of Science of the USA and in 2010 he received a Knighthood for his services to Science.
Professor Douglas Wallace, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of PennsylvaniaA bioenergetic theory of evolution and disease
Western biomedical philosophy has been dominated by a structural paradigm of evolution, an anatomical paradigm of medicine, and a Mendelian paradigm of genetics. While these have been a powerful combination for addressing many previous biomedical questions, they have proven inadequate to understand the biology and genetics of the common metabolic and degenerative diseases, cancer, and aging. Life is the interplay between structure (anatomy), energy (vital force), and information (inheritance, Mendelian and otherwise). By switching our perspective from anatomy to energy and from the Mendelian genetics of anatomy to the non-Mendelian inheritance of energy we can generate a comprehensive paradigm of evolution, a coherent paradigm of complex diseases, and an integrated paradigm of inheritance. These three new paradigms provide straight forward explanations to the enigma of the selectionist-neutralist debate in evolutionary genetics as well as to the biology and inheritance of the common “complex” diseases.
Professor Wallace graduated from Yale University with a Ph.D. in Microbiology and Human Genetics in 1975. After a one year NIH postdoctoral fellowship he was appointed as Assistant Professor of Genetics at Stanford Medical School where he served from 1976 to 1983. In 1983 he was appointed Professor of Biological Chemistry and Pediatrics at Emory University School of Medicine and subsequently became Professor of Anthropology and Genetics. In 1990, he was made the Robert W. Woodruff Professor of Molecular Genetics and founded the Center for Molecular Medicine and in 1992 he founded the Department of Genetics and Molecular Medicine at Emory. In 2002, he moved to the University of California, Irvine as the Donald Bren Professor of Molecular Medicine and Director of the Center for Molecular and Mitochondrial Medicine and Genetics. In 2010, he moved to the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania as the Michael and Charles Barnett Chair of Pediatric Mitochondrial Medicine and Metabolic Disease, Director of the Center for Mitochondrial and Epigenomic Medicine, and Professor in the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. He was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1995, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2004, and the Institute of Medicine in 2010.
Book prize event 6 Mar
History of science lecture 7 Mar
Enter your email address to receive updates about scientific meetings at the Royal Society
Full listing of our events and exhibitions.
Watch videos of past events.
Most of our talks are free and open to the public.
We host major conferences for leading scientists.
Explore our annual science exhibition
Contact the events team.