Support us | Visit us | Contact us
01 December 2011
Nations, NGOs and individuals must engage in a wide-ranging dialogue to explore both the potential risks and benefits of solar geoengineering and establish effective governance arrangements for research, according to a this report from an international collaboration of NGOs: the Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative (SRMGI).
SRMGI is convened by the Royal Society, Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) and the Academy of Sciences for the Developing World (TWAS).
SRMGI was established in March 2010 to explore how to govern the developing research area of Solar Radiation Management (SRM), a type of geoengineering that would cause a small percentage of inbound sunlight to be reflected back into space, in order to reduce global warming.
Interest in SRM technologies has increased rapidly in recent years, as their potential to be both useful and/or harmful to the planet has been recognised. SRM methods may be able to reduce temperatures quickly and relatively cheaply. However, these technologies could also have significant unanticipated side effects. Moreover, they would not affect the cause of climate change, rising levels of greenhouse gases, and the associated threat of ocean acidification and could conceivably be implemented unilaterally, without consultation or agreement from all individuals and nations that could be affected.
SRMGI has brought together diverse opinions and expertise from the fields of natural sciences, social science, governance and law, as well as environmental and development NGOs, industry and civil society organisations, from across the globe to discuss this issue. Following a major conference in March 2011, this report summarises the opinions gathered and the issues raised from this and other meetings, including input from experts and organisations from 22 different countries.
Professor John Shepherd, Fellow of the Royal Society and a co-chair of SRMGI, said: “Unless the apparent lack of political will to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions changes soon, geoengineering may be needed and SRM methods could be used in unregulated and possibly reckless ways by individuals, corporations or individual countries. These actions would have consequences beyond national borders that are as yet unknown. We must also work outside our national borders, bringing together interested parties from around the globe to debate the issues of geoengineering, agree appropriate governance structures and ensure that any research is undertaken in a safe, transparent and socially acceptable manner. The question of whether solar geoengineering will prove to be helpful or harmful will largely depend on how humanity can govern the issue and its political implications, and avoid unilateral action.”
More information about the initiative is available on the Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative (SRMGI) website.
Solar radiation management: the governance of researchpublished in December 2011
Project detailsannounced in March 2010
In 2009 the Royal Society published the report ‘Geoengineering the climate: science, governance and uncertainty’. The Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative was launched in March 2010 in response to this report.
Enter your email address to receive monthly updates on our policy work.
Our policy projects are led by Fellows and other experts.
Our policy work is organised around four themes.
Search all of our policy publications.
Meetings, events and discussions for policymakers
Get the latest news and comment from the Science Policy Centre
Send a message to the Science Policy team.