Ageing process

Ageing process.

An article written by Professor Dame Linda Partridge DBE FRS.

Ageing is the result of an accumulation of damage to molecules, cells and tissues, leading to loss of function and increased risk of death. The major burden of ill health is now falling on the older section of the population; therefore, it is vital that we find ways to keep people healthier as they age.

Professor John Harris speaking at a panel discussion on 11 May 2010. (4 mins, requires Flash Player).

Until recently ageing appeared to be intractably complex, with many kinds of damage accumulating in different parts of the body, suggesting that there is no single ageing process, but a host of problems occurring in parallel. As a result, there has been widespread pessimism about the prospects for investigating the ageing process experimentally or for intervening in it medically.

Research into ageing has been revolutionised by discoveries made using laboratory animals. Not only can mutations in single genes and simple environmental interventions, such as diet, greatly extend lifespan, the same interventions can do the same in distantly related creatures, such as yeast, roundworms, fruit flies, mice and primates. This evolutionary conservation of the  mechanisms of ageing means that we can use simpler and shorter-lived organisms to understand aspects of human ageing.   Furthermore, the extension of lifespan is achieved by keeping the animals healthy and youthful for longer, rather than merely lengthening the moribund period at the end of life, and as a result the animals are protected against ageing-related diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular disease and neurodegeneration. 

    Audio
    Professor Cynthia Kenyon on genes and cells that can expand the life of C elegans (3 mins).
  • Listen here.

Recent work has started to examine the effects of natural genetic variation in human populations on the rate of ageing.  Genes in humans that are equivalent to those that, when mutated, extend lifespan in animals, have been identified and it is then determined if particular variant forms of these genes are associated with human lifespan. The results have been encouraging and provide further evidence that we can use animal models to reveal mechanisms of human ageing.

Positron emission tomography (PET) scan of the brain of a patient with Alzheimer’s Disease.

The ageing process poses challenges, because it is complex and there are probably quite strong interactions between different tissues in the body during ageing. For instance, reduced kidney function is a risk factor for problems in several other tissues.  Furthermore, we need to better understand the relationships between the genomes of the different organisms, and the control of gene expression. Research into ageing is still a relatively youthful field, and we are far from being able to produce detailed, quantitative, descriptions of the ageing process or how interventions might extend lifespan.
    Audio
    Professor Nir Barzilai on treating ageing-related disease (2 mins).
  • Listen here.

Many aspects of the ageing process that reduce quality of life in humans involve loss of function in particular tissues. For instance, the loss of muscle function (sarcopaenia) reduces mobility and increases the likelihood of falls, while loss of neuronal function and of the neurons themselves (neurodegeneration) can reduce cognitive function and control of movement. A major challenge will be to understand how interventions that increase lifespan can improve function in these tissues, and how the same intervention can ameliorate the effects of ageing in different tissues. This will require detailed work at the molecular, cellular and whole tissue level, and integration of the information into an overall picture of the alterations to tissue function during ageing.

Several pathways that have proven important in the extension of lifespan normally function to match costly activities of the organism, such as growth, metabolism and reproduction, to intake of nutrients. Many of the molecules in these pathways are ‘druggable’, meaning that the activity of the whole pathway can be altered by a drug. Thoughts in this field are turning to the idea that, in the future, there might be a broad-spectrum, preventative medicine for the diseases of ageing in humans.

This contrasts sharply with current medical practice, which tackles each disease separately at the level of research and clinical practice, and tackles ageing-related disease separately from geriatrics, largely a non-research based clinical speciality. Unlike a scientific investigation, the identification of possible drug targets does not require that we know everything about the system. One of the major, probably tractable, challenges in the near future is to ascertain and validate potential drug targets in animals that might be therapeutic in humans. This will require an understanding of just how deep the evolutionary conservation of the pathways involved penetrates.

The major aim of research into ageing is to improve human health during later life because this is where the real burden of ill-health in developed countries is now falling. Some modest increase in lifespan may also occur as a result, but this is likely to be minor in comparison to the steady increase in life expectancy of two to five years per decade that we have seen since the mid-nineteenth century, which continues unabated today.

Banner image: National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health

Discussion meeting

This article is based on the discussion meeting 'The new science of ageing' which was held on 10-11 May 2010.

Related journal

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B
12 January 2011 vol. 366 no. 1561

This volume contains selected papers from this discussion meeting.

From the Royal Society's archives

At some point in the 17th century, Robert Boyle (a founding Fellow of the Royal Society) dictated a list of things that he hoped the new “Natural Philosophy” of the Royal Society would achieve.  At the top of the list is “The Prolongation of Life”, showing us that scientifically inclined minds, such as Boyle, were already beginning to speculate on the ageing process at the dawn of the scientific revolution.

While better medicines and improved living conditions in some societies during the 18th and 19th centuries demonstrated that dramatic increases in life expectancy were possible, the process of ageing itself remained mysterious.  In the 20th century, the subject exercised the biologist and science writer Peter Medawar FRS who tried to explain the phenomena of ageing as consequences of Darwinian evolutionary forces.

What most people would understand as ageing is actually senescence – the physical declines accompanying the accumulation of an organism’s years which increase the likelihood of its death. Instead of interpreting these as a simple matter of the body “wearing out”, Medawar thought that some fuller explanation was necessary, since it did not follow that animals must decline with age.

He suggested that some mutations might lower the viability of organisms, but only reveal themselves in a post-reproductive phase of life, by which time the biological disadvantages were irrelevant. Ageing was an artefact of domesticity, for in nature, animals (including humans) seldom lived long enough beyond reproduction for the problems to become apparent. 

Now termed mutation-accumulation theory, this is one of several competing scientific theories of ageing.  While we may be some time away from achieving the prolongation of life as Boyle imagined it, today’s scientists have surely set us well on the way.