Science as a global public good? From the right to participate in science to science governance
Science+ meeting organised by Professor Geoffrey Boulton FRS and Professor Michela Massimi.
With support from UNESCO.
The role of science for democratic societies has never been more important. Treating science as a global public good, amid rampant privatisation of scientific research, is a powerful structuring concept for science policy, and it offers a possible lens for interpreting the human right to participate in science. The purpose of the meeting is to explore the theoretical and practical consequences of this move for science governance and scientific research.
Programme
The programme, including speaker biographies and abstracts, is available below but please note the programme may be subject to change.
Attending this event
This event is intended for researchers in the relevant fields.
- Free to attend
- Both virtual and in-person attendance is available. Advance registration is essential
- To attend virtually, please register and you will be sent a streaming link close to the meeting date
- Lunch is available on both days of the meeting for an optional £25 per day. There are plenty of places to eat nearby if you would prefer to purchase food offsite. Participants are welcome to bring their own lunch to the meeting
Enquiries: Scientific Programmes team.
Organisers
Schedule
Chair
Professor Uta Frith DBE FRS
UCL University College London, UK
Professor Uta Frith DBE FRS
UCL University College London, UK
Uta Frith was born and educated in Germany and trained in Clinical Psychology at London University. She completed her PhD on "Pattern detection in autistic children" in 1968, and was, from 1968 to 2006 an MRC funded researcher, affiliated to UCL. She specialised in the study of autism and dyslexia and has become a leading voice in these fields. Her work has led to a hierarchical framework for the study of developmental disorders, which distinguishes knowledge and inference at three levels, spanning biology, cognition and behaviour. She is a champion of Slow Science, with the motto "less, but better."
Professor Chris Frith
University College London, UK
Professor Chris Frith
University College London, UK
Christopher D Frith FRS FBA is Emeritus Professor of Neuropsychology in the Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging at University College, London, and Niels Bohr Visiting Professor in the Interacting Minds project at the University of Aarhus, Denmark. He is one of the pioneers in applying brain imaging to the study of mental processes. He is known especially for his work on agency, social intelligence, and understanding the minds of people with autism and schizophrenia.
| 09:15-09:30 |
Welcome by the Royal Society and organising committee
Professor Michela MassimiUniversity of Edinburgh, UK
Professor Michela MassimiUniversity of Edinburgh, UK Michela Massimi is Professor of Philosophy of Science at the University of Edinburgh. She is Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Royal Astronomical Society, the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina, and elected member of the Academia Europaea. Professor Massimi has written extensively on a variety of philosophical topics surrounding scientific practice, from pluralism in science to local knowledge and the right to participate in science. In 2017 she received the Royal Society Wilkins-Bernal-Medawar Medal for her interdisciplinary work in philosophy of science. Her 2022 monograph Perspectival Realism (OUP) won the Lakatos Award in 2023. She has served as President of the US-based Philosophy of Science Association (2023-24) and previously as Vice President of the European Philosophy of Science Association (2015-19). For more details please see: https://www.michelamassimi.com. |
|---|---|
| 09:30-10:00 |
Making science a public good
Well-informed citizens are essential to democracy, and a “scientific temper”, a willingness to change previous conclusions in the face of new evidence, is crucial in making sense of and navigating the increasingly complex world we live in. Such a “temper” invigorates society’s ability to make informed judgements in complex settings. Treating science as a public good, free at the point of use, is a policy option that could contribute to this objective and a means of realising the human right to science. This has, however, become more problematic in the last two decades. Algorithms used by social media platforms have discouraged restraint and created self-insulating bubbles of certainty that undermine societal dialogue. Increasingly illiberal governments have fostered “alternative facts” and “viewpoint diversity”. The landscape of communication has been crumbling before our eyes, crippling the very institutions that have provided the frame for social solidarity in modern democracies. Where might countervailing action come from? Is the science community able to change? Could the universities lead in a new era of science that is open to society?
Professor Geoffrey Boulton FRSEdinburgh University
Professor Geoffrey Boulton FRSEdinburgh University Geoffrey Boulton OBE FRSE MAE FRS is Regius Professor of Geology Emeritus at Edinburgh University, distinguished for his research in glaciology. He has been a member of the UK Prime Minister’s Council for Science and Technology, chaired the Royal Society’s Science Policy Centre and several of its science reports, including Science as an Open Enterprise. He has been President of the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA) and is a member of the Governing Board of the International Science Council for which he authored its position paper on Science as a Global Public Good. |
| 10:00-10:30 |
The relationship between the freedom and safety of scientific researchers, public trust in science, and an inclusive science-policy interface
The rights to participate in scientific progress and to enjoy the benefits of scientific knowledge are crucial to science as a public good. Scientific freedom is an inherent and inalienable component of these rights and it is fundamental to good science. By reference to practical work being done at UNESCO, we demonstrate the indivisible relationship between the freedom and safety of scientific researchers, public trust in science, and an effective and inclusive science policy interface. We do so through the interaction of UNESCO’s Recommendations on Science and Scientific Researchers (2017) and Open Science (2021) and CESCR’s General Comment No. 25. Specifically, we survey three major UNESCO projects and apply them to the practical implementation of the right to science: its Call to Action on the Freedom and Safety of Scientists, particularly as a means to secure intellectual autonomy; reporting by States in respect of the right science in the UDHR through the UPR process and on the implementation of the RSSR; and an Assessment Tool currently being developed to monitor implementation of the RSSR’s norms and standards by UNESCO Member States.
Dr Konstantinos TararasUNESCO, France
Dr Konstantinos TararasUNESCO, France Konstantinos Tararas serves as programme specialist for UNESCO's Inclusion, Rights and Intercultural Dialogue Section in Paris. Since joining the Organization in 2001, he has contributed to a wide range of activities in the field of human rights. Highlights include the promotion of a human rights-based approach in UNESCO programming, efforts towards the normative clarification of the right to share in scientific advancement and its benefits, and development of practical guidance for city-level inclusion, with emphasis on migrants. Since 2020, he has returned to the issue of human rights in science, concentrating on the implementation of UNESCO's 2017 Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers. Currently he leads work under UNESCO's Programme for the promotion of scientific freedom and the safety of scientists and the dedicated Call to Action. Dr Andrew MazibradaUNESCO, UK Dr Andrew MazibradaUNESCO, UK |
| 10:30-11:00 |
Coffee break
|
| 11:00-11:30 |
A human rights approach to science: recalibrating the priorities
In their piece based on the 2023 report of the Special Rapporteur in the field of Cultural rights, Xanthaki and Bidault argue that the right to science is essential in current discussions about the main challenges that society faces, not least the use of technology, climate change and the allocation and use of resources. Yet, this right as recognised in article 15 ICESCR is hugely underused by international organisations and states alike. The article discusses the meaning of science as infused by the principles of diversity and decolonisation of science. It then zooms into reflecting on the recognition of the right to ‘everyone’ and discusses how this can be realised. A decolonised right to science where everyone participates in defining and implementing it entails reset priorities and foci that the piece advocates for.
Professor Alexandra XanthakiUN Special Rapporteur Cultural Rights
Professor Alexandra XanthakiUN Special Rapporteur Cultural Rights Alexandra Xanthaki was appointed UN Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights in October 2021. Alexandra Xanthaki is Professor of Laws at Brunel University London, United Kingdom. A leading expert on cultural rights, Alexandra has published on cultural rights of minorities and indigenous peoples, cultural diversity, cultural heritage, balancing cultural rights with other rights and interests, and multicultural aspects of international human rights law.
Dr Mylène BidaultUnited Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Dr Mylène BidaultUnited Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Mylène Bidault is a Human Rights Officer at the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations, working with the Special Rapporteur on cultural rights and the Special Rapporteur on the right to education. In the past, she has also assisted the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, particularly for the drafting of its General Comment 21 on the right to take part in cultural life. A Doctor of Law, she participated in the drafting and dissemination of the Fribourg Declaration on Cultural Rights (2007). She published the book “The international protection of cultural rights” (Bruylant, 2009, in French) and a number of articles on the issue of cultural rights, including the right to participate in science. |
| 11:30-12:00 |
‘As open as possible’: The right to science to the rescue?
Both the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) from 1966 offer a broad and rights-based approach to the topic of science as a global public good. One relevant and important part of the right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its applications (or just the right to science), outlined in Article 15 of the ICESCR, is the obligation it places on member states to “recognize the benefits to be derived from the encouragement and development of international contacts and co-operation in the scientific and cultural fields” (Article 15,4). International scientific cooperation and the free flow of people and ideas are necessary for scientists to enjoy their scientific freedom, which is respected in Article 15,3 ICESCR. And without scientific freedom no groundbreaking research will be generated that can be shared for the benefit of all. This essay will discuss two current developments that act as unfortunate obstacles to the enjoyment of science as a global public good: the securitization of research and intellectual property. The argument is that the right to science may help us fight against the worst excesses of both.
Professor Helle PorsdamUNESCO Chair on the right to science, Denmark
Professor Helle PorsdamUNESCO Chair on the right to science, Denmark Helle Porsdam is Professor of History and Cultural Rights in the Faculties of Humanities and Law at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark, where she also holds the UNESCO Chair in the Right to Science. She did her PhD in American Studies at Yale University and has been a Liberal Arts Fellow twice at the Harvard Law School. In 2021, she was Leverhulme Visiting Professor at the University of Cambridge and before that, she was a Global Ethics Fellow at the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs in New York City. Porsdam has written extensively on cultural rights, especially the right to science. Among her most recent work may be mentioned her monographs The Transforming Power of Cultural Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2019) and Science as a Cultural Human Right (University of Pennsylvania Series in Human Rights, 2022), her co-authored volume Scientific Freedom: The Heart of the Right to Science (Rowman & Littlefield, 2023), and her co-edited volume The Right to Science: Then and Now (Cambridge University Press, 2022). |
Chair
Professor Jim Al-Khalili CBE FRS
University of Surrey, UK
Professor Jim Al-Khalili CBE FRS
University of Surrey, UK
Jim Al-Khalili is a theoretical physicist and currently Distinguished Professor Emeritus in Physics at the University of Surrey. He received his PhD in nuclear reaction theory in 1989 and has published widely in the field. His current research interests are in open quantum systems, the application of quantum mechanics in biology and the foundations and history of quantum mechanics. In 2018, he helped establish at Surrey the world’s first doctoral training centre in quantum biology and, in 2020, set up a new Quantum Foundations Centre.
Jim is a prominent author and broadcaster. He has written 16 books on popular science and the history of science, between them translated into twenty-six languages. Two of his books (Life on the Edge: The Coming of Age of Quantum Biology and The World According to Physics) were shortlisted for the Royal Society Trivedi and Winton Prizes, respectively. He is a regular presenter of TV science documentaries, such as the Bafta nominated Chemistry: a volatile history, and he hosts the long-running weekly BBC Radio 4 programme, The Life Scientific.
Jim is a past president of the British Science Association, an honorary fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering and a recipient of the Royal Society Michael Faraday medal and the Wilkins-Bernal-Medawar Medal, the Institute of Physics Kelvin Medal and the Stephen Hawking Medal for Science Communication. He received an OBE in 2007 and a CBE in 2021 for ‘services to science’.
| 13:00-13:30 |
What exactly is "The human right to science"?
This essay will explore what people might be asking for when they insist on “the human right to science”. Typically, rights are connected with actions or with protections against the actions of others. In the case of science, there might be a right to participate in scientific investigation, or a right to have access to the studies of the scientific community, or a right not to have a local culture displaced by practices generated from some field of science. And, beyond these three possibilities, there are other alternatives. I shall canvass what I take to be the principal candidates, and try to evaluate their status as pan-human rights.
Professor Philip KitcherColumbia University, US
Professor Philip KitcherColumbia University, US Philip Kitcher is John Dewey Professor Emeritus at Columbia University and an Honorary Fellow at Christ's College Cambridge. He is the author of 22 books on philosophical topics ranging from the sciences to ethics, political philosophy, music and literature. His awards include the Prometheus Prize (given by the American Philosophical Association for work that expands the frontiers of Science and Philosophy), the Rescher Medal (for systematic philosophy), the Hempel Award (for lifetime achievement in Philosophy of Science), and the BBVA "Frontiers of Knowledge" Award for work in the Humanities. He received the Lakatos Prize for his Book Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature, the Lionel Trilling Award for In Mendel's Mirror, and the Lannan Award for Living with Darwin. |
|---|---|
| 13:30-14:00 |
When is science a global public good? A human-rights approach to transnational science governance
In this talk I will be exploring the broad contours of a new social contract for science, with a focus on public participation in science. I start with the debate on disinformation and misinformation and I present a problem that arises when the best available scientific evidence is used and communicated to the public in a deceptive way. Using as a test case the problem of global plastic waste, I argue for the need of a human-rights approach to science. I leverage the human right to participate in science and the right to a clean environment to argue that public participation in science is pivotal to a new transparent and participative social contract for science and to the delivery of transnational public goods such as environmental protection.
Professor Michela MassimiUniversity of Edinburgh, UK
Professor Michela MassimiUniversity of Edinburgh, UK Michela Massimi is Professor of Philosophy of Science at the University of Edinburgh. She is Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Royal Astronomical Society, the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina, and elected member of the Academia Europaea. Professor Massimi has written extensively on a variety of philosophical topics surrounding scientific practice, from pluralism in science to local knowledge and the right to participate in science. In 2017 she received the Royal Society Wilkins-Bernal-Medawar Medal for her interdisciplinary work in philosophy of science. Her 2022 monograph Perspectival Realism (OUP) won the Lakatos Award in 2023. She has served as President of the US-based Philosophy of Science Association (2023-24) and previously as Vice President of the European Philosophy of Science Association (2015-19). For more details please see: https://www.michelamassimi.com. |
| 14:00-14:30 |
What could a human right to participate in science be?
At first sight, the idea of a human right to participate in science may seem absurd. Many assume science must be the preserve of those with the training and aptitude. However, feminist studies of science teaches that science is a social practice, with norms of inclusion and exclusion. Political philosophers have also introduced the notion of ‘contributive justice’: that it is an injustice if some cannot contribute to the well-being of others. Combining these insights with that of science as a global public good, I explore the possibilities of a human right to participate in science.
Professor Jonathan WolffUniversity of Oxford, UK
Professor Jonathan WolffUniversity of Oxford, UK Jonathan Wolff (FBA) is Emeritus Alfred Landecker Professor of Values and Public Policy at the Blavatnik School of Government, Oxford. He is a political philosopher, especially interested in the connection between political philosophy and public policy. He is the author of many books, papers, and newspaper columns, including on questions of health and human rights. He was a member of The Nuffield Council of Bioethics. He is the President of The Royal Institute of Philosophy. |
| 14:30-14:50 |
Coffee break
|
| 14:50-15:20 |
Can science diplomacy help safeguard science as a global public good? Some reflections
In a world where scientific data - and data generally - have significant commercial value, and where geopolitical tensions strongly impinge on international scientific collaboration, the notion and practice of science as global public good is under pressure and so are the ways to pursue it. Science diplomacy acknowledges that science impacts diplomacy and diplomacy impacts science, and that both cooperation and competition shape the diverse practices of science diplomacy -from science fostering international relations and serving global public goods, to foreign and security policy interests being in conflict with the notion of science as an open, collaborative enterprise. Three challenges and opportunities for safeguarding science as a global public good through science diplomacy looks especially worth considering: they relate to strategy, data, people. Strategy: the notion of “technological sovereignty” emerged recently: is such notion, and its practices, compatible with or a threat to the notion of science -closely interlinked with technology- as global public good? Data: scientists have been developing and relying on large datasets to address the causes and impacts of climate change, pandemics and more; these are at risk due to both deletion policies by governments and by appropriation processes by companies. How can science as global public good ‘survive’ such challenge? People: science is made by people (also in an increasingly “AI world”). Academics, scientists, teachers have been increasingly affected by or a direct target of violent conflicts. In addition, academic freedom is being restricted in many countries. What are the implications for science as global public good?
Dr Angela LiberatoreScience Diplomacy Fellow, European University Institute, Italy
Dr Angela LiberatoreScience Diplomacy Fellow, European University Institute, Italy Angela Liberatore is Science Diplomacy fellow at the European University Institute. She previously served as Head of the Scientific Department at the European Research Council, the EU programme for frontier research in all fields of knowledge. Previously, Angela worked in the EU research programmes on environment and climate, social sciences and humanities and then international cooperation. Among her ‘highlights’, she co-chaired the Social Protection group for the UN Research Roadmap for COVID-19 Recovery, contributed to the EC White Paper on European Governance and the negotiation of the Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change, and -more recently- was part of the drafting team of the European Approach to Science Diplomacy (published in February 2025). Angela holds a PhD in Political and Social Sciences (European University Institute) and a degree in Philosophy (University of Bologna) and was Fullbright Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government of Harvard University. |
| 15:20-15:50 |
Education, diversity and progress
Around the world, girls and women are much less likely to be able to access and complete a good education, yet investing in their education helps them develop skills for jobs - the surest way out of poverty. However, around the world expectations of what is ‘appropriate’ for girls to study and the imposition of gender stereotypes can limit the actual education and the aspirations of women. Even in countries such as the UK, stereotyping continues to deter girls from pursuing careers based around subjects like the physical sciences, engineering and computing, and timely careers advice is often lacking. Access to a good science education matters, whether or not a girl is going to follow a professional career, for instance providing information about nutrition and healthcare that can be brought into the home environment. Indeed, in an increasingly technological world, many daily decisions require some understanding of basic science concepts. The potential absence of the voices of women mean many problems that affect them may get overlooked or remain unfunded. This is the case, for instance, for many diseases that affect only or predominantly women, such as endometriosis. What technologies get developed and who they benefit needs to be as focussed around women as men. The world economy is impacted by the loss of women’s voices and individuals may be hindered or even harmed.
Professor Dame Athene Donald DBE FRSUniversity of Cambridge, UK
Professor Dame Athene Donald DBE FRSUniversity of Cambridge, UK Athene Donald is an emeritus Professor of Physics who is well known for her early work on synthetic polymers, concentrating on relating the structure of polymers to their function. Athene subsequently transferred her knowledge to soft matter and biological physics more broadly, developing specialised imaging techniques such as environmental scanning electron microscopy along the way. In synthetic polymers, she studied crazing — the fine cracks that precede fracture — by exploring what determines their formation. Subsequently, she utilised X-ray scattering techniques to characterise changes that occur in the natural polymer starch upon cooking and other forms of processing. More recently she explored universal behaviour in protein aggregation (in vitro). In 2006, she was the Bakerian Lecturer for the Royal Society. She won the 2009 L'Oreal/ UNESCO Laureate for Europe. In 2010 was awarded the Faraday Medal of the Institute of Physics and also received a DBE for services to physics. From 2013-18 she served on the Scientific Council of the ERC, and is Chair of REF2021 Interdisciplinary Advisory Council. Beyond her research, Athene has an active interest in issues surrounding gender equality and is a former Chair of the Athena Forum, which aims to improve the situation for women in science, technology, engineering and medicine in UK higher education. Athene has twice been a member of the Society’s Council and chaired the Education Committee from 2010-2014. |
| 15:50-16:10 |
Coffee break
|
| 16:10-16:55 |
Roundtable: The conceptual framework
Discussion led by Chair, Professor Jim Al-Khalili
Professor Jim Al-Khalili CBE FRSUniversity of Surrey, UK
Professor Jim Al-Khalili CBE FRSUniversity of Surrey, UK Jim Al-Khalili is a theoretical physicist and currently Distinguished Professor Emeritus in Physics at the University of Surrey. He received his PhD in nuclear reaction theory in 1989 and has published widely in the field. His current research interests are in open quantum systems, the application of quantum mechanics in biology and the foundations and history of quantum mechanics. In 2018, he helped establish at Surrey the world’s first doctoral training centre in quantum biology and, in 2020, set up a new Quantum Foundations Centre. Jim is a prominent author and broadcaster. He has written 16 books on popular science and the history of science, between them translated into twenty-six languages. Two of his books (Life on the Edge: The Coming of Age of Quantum Biology and The World According to Physics) were shortlisted for the Royal Society Trivedi and Winton Prizes, respectively. He is a regular presenter of TV science documentaries, such as the Bafta nominated Chemistry: a volatile history, and he hosts the long-running weekly BBC Radio 4 programme, The Life Scientific. Jim is a past president of the British Science Association, an honorary fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering and a recipient of the Royal Society Michael Faraday medal and the Wilkins-Bernal-Medawar Medal, the Institute of Physics Kelvin Medal and the Stephen Hawking Medal for Science Communication. He received an OBE in 2007 and a CBE in 2021 for ‘services to science’.
Dr Konstantinos TararasUNESCO, France
Dr Konstantinos TararasUNESCO, France Konstantinos Tararas serves as programme specialist for UNESCO's Inclusion, Rights and Intercultural Dialogue Section in Paris. Since joining the Organization in 2001, he has contributed to a wide range of activities in the field of human rights. Highlights include the promotion of a human rights-based approach in UNESCO programming, efforts towards the normative clarification of the right to share in scientific advancement and its benefits, and development of practical guidance for city-level inclusion, with emphasis on migrants. Since 2020, he has returned to the issue of human rights in science, concentrating on the implementation of UNESCO's 2017 Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers. Currently he leads work under UNESCO's Programme for the promotion of scientific freedom and the safety of scientists and the dedicated Call to Action.
Professor Alexandra XanthakiUN Special Rapporteur Cultural Rights
Professor Alexandra XanthakiUN Special Rapporteur Cultural Rights Alexandra Xanthaki was appointed UN Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights in October 2021. Alexandra Xanthaki is Professor of Laws at Brunel University London, United Kingdom. A leading expert on cultural rights, Alexandra has published on cultural rights of minorities and indigenous peoples, cultural diversity, cultural heritage, balancing cultural rights with other rights and interests, and multicultural aspects of international human rights law.
Professor Helle PorsdamUNESCO Chair on the right to science, Denmark
Professor Helle PorsdamUNESCO Chair on the right to science, Denmark Helle Porsdam is Professor of History and Cultural Rights in the Faculties of Humanities and Law at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark, where she also holds the UNESCO Chair in the Right to Science. She did her PhD in American Studies at Yale University and has been a Liberal Arts Fellow twice at the Harvard Law School. In 2021, she was Leverhulme Visiting Professor at the University of Cambridge and before that, she was a Global Ethics Fellow at the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs in New York City. Porsdam has written extensively on cultural rights, especially the right to science. Among her most recent work may be mentioned her monographs The Transforming Power of Cultural Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2019) and Science as a Cultural Human Right (University of Pennsylvania Series in Human Rights, 2022), her co-authored volume Scientific Freedom: The Heart of the Right to Science (Rowman & Littlefield, 2023), and her co-edited volume The Right to Science: Then and Now (Cambridge University Press, 2022).
Professor Michela MassimiUniversity of Edinburgh, UK
Professor Michela MassimiUniversity of Edinburgh, UK Michela Massimi is Professor of Philosophy of Science at the University of Edinburgh. She is Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Royal Astronomical Society, the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina, and elected member of the Academia Europaea. Professor Massimi has written extensively on a variety of philosophical topics surrounding scientific practice, from pluralism in science to local knowledge and the right to participate in science. In 2017 she received the Royal Society Wilkins-Bernal-Medawar Medal for her interdisciplinary work in philosophy of science. Her 2022 monograph Perspectival Realism (OUP) won the Lakatos Award in 2023. She has served as President of the US-based Philosophy of Science Association (2023-24) and previously as Vice President of the European Philosophy of Science Association (2015-19). For more details please see: https://www.michelamassimi.com.
Professor Philip KitcherColumbia University, US
Professor Philip KitcherColumbia University, US Philip Kitcher is John Dewey Professor Emeritus at Columbia University and an Honorary Fellow at Christ's College Cambridge. He is the author of 22 books on philosophical topics ranging from the sciences to ethics, political philosophy, music and literature. His awards include the Prometheus Prize (given by the American Philosophical Association for work that expands the frontiers of Science and Philosophy), the Rescher Medal (for systematic philosophy), the Hempel Award (for lifetime achievement in Philosophy of Science), and the BBVA "Frontiers of Knowledge" Award for work in the Humanities. He received the Lakatos Prize for his Book Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature, the Lionel Trilling Award for In Mendel's Mirror, and the Lannan Award for Living with Darwin.
Professor Jonathan WolffUniversity of Oxford, UK
Professor Jonathan WolffUniversity of Oxford, UK Jonathan Wolff (FBA) is Emeritus Alfred Landecker Professor of Values and Public Policy at the Blavatnik School of Government, Oxford. He is a political philosopher, especially interested in the connection between political philosophy and public policy. He is the author of many books, papers, and newspaper columns, including on questions of health and human rights. He was a member of The Nuffield Council of Bioethics. He is the President of The Royal Institute of Philosophy. |
| 16:55-17:00 |
Closing remarks
|
| 17:00-18:30 |
Drinks reception
|
Chair
Dr Fiona Marshall FRS
Head of Neuroscience Discovery and Head of the Discovery Research Centre in London, UK
Dr Fiona Marshall FRS
Head of Neuroscience Discovery and Head of the Discovery Research Centre in London, UK
Fiona Marshall is President of Novartis Biomedical Research where she leads approximately 5,500 scientists and other associates across nine research sites dedicated to the discovery of high-value medicines for patients.
Prior to taking up her current role in November 2022, Fiona served as senior vice president and global head of discovery sciences, preclinical development and translational medicine at MSD. Fiona holds a bachelor’s degree in biochemistry from University of Bath and a doctorate in neuroscience from the University of Cambridge, both in the UK. She was the recipient of the 2012 WISE Women of Outstanding Achievement for Innovation and Entrepreneurship Award, the 2015 RSC Malcolm Campbell Award for Chemistry, and the Vane Medal from the British Pharmacological Society. She is also a fellow of the Royal Society and the Academy of Medical Sciences, and an honorary fellow of both the British Pharmacological Society and the Royal Society of Chemistry.
| 09:00-09:30 |
The technological and societal determinants of open science
The advance of science is dependent on the communication technologies available to it and is structured by intrinsic social conventions and norms as well as extrinsic commercial and political forces. The idea of knowledge as a public good was enabled by the printing press and reinforced by recognising priority in publication as the basis for academic status. Today digital technologies have again disrupted the communication of science; the use of traditional publication as the basis for research evaluation has developed multiple pathologies; commercial rent-seeking by enclosure of the intellectual commons is rampant; and we see a disturbing rise in nationalism and protectionism. How do we defend and promote science as a global public good in this fragmented world?
Professor Luke DruryDublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Ireland
Professor Luke DruryDublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Ireland Luke Drury is a theoretical astrophysicist working mainly in the area of high-energy astrophysics, but with broad interests in computational methods, plasma physics and gas dynamics. He was President of the RIA 2011-2014. For full details see: orcid.org/0000-0002-9257-2270. |
|---|---|
| 09:30-10:00 |
Life science research: constants and variables in a changing world
Life science research has never been more dynamic, multidisciplinary and potentially productive. We have unprecedented tools to study living things at the molecular, cellular and organismal levels and more scientists worldwide than ever before to make use of them. Despite this, it often feels as though the enterprise is teetering on the edge of crisis. This is partly due to the uncertain world in within which research is now conducted. But it is also due to constraints on essential aspects of the scientific process itself – some old and some new. As a university-based academic with 50 years’ experience as a group leader, I will present reflections on the process and funding of research as well as its communication via the scientific literature. The persistence of scientific fashions, the bureaucratization of institutions and the importance of incremental discovery will be discussed.
Professor Sir Adrian Bird FRSUniversity of Edinburgh, UK
Professor Sir Adrian Bird FRSUniversity of Edinburgh, UK Adrian Bird graduated in Biochemistry from the University of Sussex in 1968 and obtained his PhD at the University of Edinburgh. Following postdoctoral experience at the Universities of Yale and Zurich, he joined the Medical Research Council’s Mammalian Genome Unit in Edinburgh. In 1987, he moved to Vienna to become a Senior Scientist at the newly-founded Institute for Molecular Pathology. He was a governor of Wellcome from 2000-2010, a trustee of Cancer Research UK from 2010-2016 and received a knighthood in 2014. He is currently chair of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Francis Crick Institute and is Deputy Director of SIDB. Adrian is based in the Centre for Cell Biology at the University of Edinburgh, where he holds the Buchanan Chair of Genetics. Awards include the Shaw Prize (2016) and the Brain Prize (2020). Adrian’s research focuses on the basic biology and biomedical significance of chromatin proteins that are frequently mutated in autism spectrum disorders. |
| 10:00-10:30 |
Public science in the age of information, misinformation, accumulation, and instant communication
The history of humankind has been, in part, the history of information control. Guilds, secrets, legal control and royal edicts have all played their part. And yet information is now shared, duplicated, circulated and amalgamated at incredible speeds. Despite this, control of information is the reaper of unprecedented gains, manipulation of information is at an all-time high, and actual human-to-human communication is increasingly fraught. The cost of science is substantial, and the blurring of corporate science and public science is seductive in its financing, yet they are not the same. Science without significant marketing can get lost in the waves of a social media sea. So is Public Science now just the branding exercise and whitewashing by powerful organisations? Is economic benefit the determiner of the value of science? Indeed, has it always really been that way? The future depends increasingly on the Scientist. More and more we need the Scientist to side with the public. I will illustrate this talk from lessons from the recent history of Artificial Intelligence research, which has both pioneered Public Science, and caused the casualty of the loss of Public Science at the same time. Finally, I will call for a better Theory of the Value of Information, the vital theory of our age.
Professor Amos StorkeyUniversity of Edinburgh, UK
Professor Amos StorkeyUniversity of Edinburgh, UK Amos Storkey is Professor of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in the School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh. He co-leads the Bayesian and Neural Systems Group in Edinburgh, with a longstanding focus on understanding and developing fundamental machine learning and AI capability, along with furthering the use of machine learning in science and medicine. He is a fellow of the ELLIS Society and has served as director of the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Data Science. He is current director of the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Machine Learning Systems. He is a strong proponent for Open Science, and for considering the value of scientific research beyond the immediate economic case and the vested interests of large corporate entities. |
| 10:30-11:00 |
Coffee break
|
| 11:00-12:00 |
Roundtable: Perspectives from working scientists and institutions
Discussion led by Chair, Dr Fiona Marshall
Dr Fiona Marshall FRSHead of Neuroscience Discovery and Head of the Discovery Research Centre in London, UK
Dr Fiona Marshall FRSHead of Neuroscience Discovery and Head of the Discovery Research Centre in London, UK Fiona Marshall is President of Novartis Biomedical Research where she leads approximately 5,500 scientists and other associates across nine research sites dedicated to the discovery of high-value medicines for patients. Prior to taking up her current role in November 2022, Fiona served as senior vice president and global head of discovery sciences, preclinical development and translational medicine at MSD. Fiona holds a bachelor’s degree in biochemistry from University of Bath and a doctorate in neuroscience from the University of Cambridge, both in the UK. She was the recipient of the 2012 WISE Women of Outstanding Achievement for Innovation and Entrepreneurship Award, the 2015 RSC Malcolm Campbell Award for Chemistry, and the Vane Medal from the British Pharmacological Society. She is also a fellow of the Royal Society and the Academy of Medical Sciences, and an honorary fellow of both the British Pharmacological Society and the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Sir Warren East FRSFormer CEO Rolls Royce, UK
Sir Warren East FRSFormer CEO Rolls Royce, UK After an Engineering degree Warren spent 30 years in the semiconductor industry becoming CEO at ARM in 2001 until 2013. He was appointed CEO at Rolls-Royce in 2015 with a mission to modernise. He stepped down at the end of 2022, leaving Rolls-Royce with significantly increased capacity and platform for enhanced profitability and cash as the sector recovered post-Covid19, together with a clear path to decarbonisation of the product portfolio. Since 2007 he has served on the boards of several major engineering and technology companies, including De La Rue, BT, Dyson and Micron. Currently he is a non-executive director at ITM Power plc; ASML NV; Tokamak Energy Ltd., and Chair of NATS. He is currently past President of the IET. He received a CBE in 2014 and a Knighthood in 2025.
Professor Sir Nigel ThriftUniversity of Bristol, UK
Professor Sir Nigel ThriftUniversity of Bristol, UK Sir Nigel is currently Chair of the UK Committee on Radioactive Waste Management. He one of the world’s leading human geographers and social scientists. His research spans a broad range of interests including international finance and financial exclusion; cities in their many guises; so-called non-representational theory; repair and maintenance, affective politics; the history of timekeeping and; universities. He was made a Fellow of the British Academy in 2003. He has been a university manager including Vice-Chancellor of the University of Warwick and before that Head of Division and then Pro-Vice-Chancellor for Research at Oxford University.
Dr Osarenkhoe OgbeideUniversity of Cambridge, UK
Dr Osarenkhoe OgbeideUniversity of Cambridge, UK Dr Osarenkhoe Ogbeide is a Royal Society Career Development Fellow based at the University of Cambridge and an Early Career Research Fellow at Churchill College. Based in the Department of Engineering, he leads internationally recognised research on advanced nanoengineered gas sensing technologies with applications spanning indoor air quality, agriculture, healthcare and environmental monitoring. Dr Ogbeide’s research focuses on the development of highly sensitive, low power gas sensors that combine functionalised graphene, metal oxides and intelligent data analysis to detect harmful airborne pollutants at low concentrations. His work aims to address one of the most pressing global health challenges by enabling affordable, scalable and accurate monitoring of indoor air pollution. He completed his PhD at the University of Cambridge, where he developed a first-of-its-kind predictive gas sensing platform capable of distinguishing multiple gases in complex real world environments. This research helped establish new approaches to chemical sensing by integrating nanomaterials engineering with machine learning techniques. In recognition of his scientific excellence and leadership potential, Dr Ogbeide was awarded a prestigious Royal Society Career Development Fellowship, one of the most competitive early career awards in the United Kingdom. The fellowship supports his independent research programme translating fundamental nanoscience into technologies with tangible societal and commercial impact. Beyond his academic work, Dr Ogbeide is a passionate advocate for equality, diversity and inclusion in science and engineering, contributing to national conversations on access, representation and policy. He is also an accomplished science communicator and illustrator, using visual storytelling to engage wider audiences and inspire the next generation of researchers and innovators.
Dr Zeynep PamukNuffield College, University of Oxford, UK
Dr Zeynep PamukNuffield College, University of Oxford, UK Zeynep Pamuk is Associate Professor in Contemporary Political Theory and Professorial Fellow at Nuffield College, University of Oxford. Before joining Oxford, she was assistant professor in the Department of Government at the London School of Economics and the Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego. She is the author of Politics and Expertise: How to Use Science in a Democratic Society (Princeton, 2021), which has received the American Political Science Association's Foundations of Political Theory Section First Book Award. She holds a PhD in political science from Harvard and a BA in ethics, politics & economics from Yale.
Professor Gabi Hegerl FRSUniversity of Edinburgh, UK
Professor Gabi Hegerl FRSUniversity of Edinburgh, UK Gabi Hegerl is a climate scientist who focuses on identifying the drivers and mechanisms of observed climate change. This work provides a critical underpinning to predictions of future changes. Gabi published some of the first studies determining that recent warming is statistically different from climate variability, and pioneered a method that distinguishes between possible causes for climate change, such as greenhouse gas increases or changes in the sun. She has also made important contributions to estimating climate sensitivity, and to determining the causes of changing characteristics of extreme weather events. Gabi's recent work has shown that human influences have changed global precipitation patterns, sharpening the contrast between wet and dry regions, while volcanic eruptions show an opposite effect. Gabi has had key roles in scientific assessments of climate change (IPCC), and is a fellow of the American Geophysical Union and of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. She received a Royal Society Wolfson Merit award, the Hans Sigrist Prize awarded by Bern University (2016) and the Achievement Award of the International Meeting on Statistical Climatology.
Dr Ed Pyzer-KnappXyme / UK Young Academy, UK
Dr Ed Pyzer-KnappXyme / UK Young Academy, UK Ed is a co-founder and Chief Scientific Officer at Xyme – an AI startup in the field of enzyme design which he has now helped to grow to over 30 people working across AI method development, computational science and engineering, and experimental disciplines. Previously, he was Head of Research Innovation at IBM UK and Ireland, providing leadership on the convergence of HPC, AI and Quantum Computing to accelerate scientific discovery. He is interested in the use of powerful emerging technologies to help to answer some of the biggest scientific challenges of our time. He obtained his PhD from the University of Cambridge, and then moved to Harvard University, finally leaving to help start the IBM Research Lab in the UK in 2015. In 2018 he became one of the youngest people to hold an honorary professorship at the University of Liverpool and in 2019 became Editor in Chief of the Wiley journal Applied AI Letters. In 2025 he was made a Bye-Fellow of Downing College, Cambridge. He has authored more than 90 papers and conference proceedings, filed multiple patents, and written a popular textbook on the use of AI for physical science, published by Wiley in 2021. Ed was elected to the UK Young Academy in 2023, and was appointed to the Executive Group as co-chair of the UK Young Academy in the same year – a position to which he was recently re-elected. In 2024, Ed was appointed a Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry (FRSC), one of the most prestigious awards the Society confers.
Dr Amy VincentUK Young Academy, UK
Dr Amy VincentUK Young Academy, UK Dr Vincent completed her PhD studying mitochondrial disease at Newcastle University under the supervision of Sir Professor Doug Turnbull. Throughout her PhD she was exposed to scientific research on mitochondrial donation and the public engagement, charity partnerships and lobbying that went along with this to ultimately change the law. In 2019 she received a Henry Wellcome Fellowship, which allowed her to establish her research group and subsequently lead to her being made an Academic Track Fellow at Newcastle University. Her research looks to understand the mechanism by which mtDNA mutations accumulate and cause disease. She joined the UK Young Academy in 2023 as part of the first cohort of members and has been on the Executive group since shortly after this. Amy is interested in the role of scientific research in education, combating misinformation and disinformation, policy and public engagement. She is also passionate about the how we support early career researchers and EDI. These interests have driven the work and roles she has engaged with through the UK Young Academy more broadly. |
Chair
Sir Mark Walport FRCP FMedSci HonFRSE FRS
The Royal Society
Sir Mark Walport FRCP FMedSci HonFRSE FRS
The Royal Society
Sir Mark Walport is Foreign Secretary and Vice President, the Royal Society. He chairs Imperial College Health Partners, Imperial College Academic Health Sciences Centre and the Kennedy Memorial Trust. He is a non-executive board member of NHS England, and trustee of the British Museum and the Daiwa Anglo-Japanese Foundation.
Previous career highlights include:
Founding Chief Executive of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), 2017 to 2020
Government Chief Scientific Adviser (GCSA), 2013 to 2017
Member and latterly co-chair of the Prime Minister’s Council for Science and Technology
Director of the Wellcome Trust
Professor and Head of the Division of Medicine, Imperial College London
Founder Fellow and first Registrar of the Academy of Medical Sciences
Member of the Advisory Board of Infrastructure UK
| 13:00-13:30 |
Science as a public good
Science brings clear public benefits, such as economic growth, improved public services, and higher quality of life. There are deeper benefits too – it shows the benefits of evidence and reason. These are powerful arguments for public funding. However that brings with it new challenges. To what extent can governments as funders also shape the research agenda? In the UK that prompts a lively and continuing debate about how to interpret the Haldane principle that Government should not interfere in research funding decisions. If Government is funding science (and even it is not) to what extent should the scientific endeavour be constrained by the values of its citizens? If such constraints are accepted it makes citizen engagement with science even more important. That brings uncomfortable questions. Is the public always going to benefit? Do the motives of scientists matter? Do the sources of funding matter? Can the integrity of research be trusted? What are the limits to the scientific enterprise and how should they be set? Science cannot enjoy the benefits of public support without also facing such difficult questions.
Professor Lord David Willetts FRSResolution Foundation, UK
Professor Lord David Willetts FRSResolution Foundation, UK The Rt Hon Lord Willetts FRS is the President of the Resolution Foundation. He is Chair of the Regulatory Innovation Office and of the UK Space Agency. He is Chair of the Foundation for Science and Technology and a visiting professor at King’s College, London. He served as the Member of Parliament for Havant (1992-2015), as Minister for Universities and Science (2010-2014) and previously worked at HM Treasury and the No. 10 Policy Unit. Lord Willetts has written widely on economic and social policy. His book “A University Education” is published by Oxford University Press. A second edition of his book “The Pinch” on fairness between the generations was published in 2019. |
|---|---|
| 13:30-14:00 |
Global science in a fractured world
In an era of intensifying geopolitical competition and technology securitization, the principle of science as a global public good faces systematic erosion. Governments increasingly view international collaboration through a zero-sum lens, implementing restrictive security protocols and retreating from multilateral frameworks precisely when global challenges demand coordinated scientific response. This widening gap between global threats and fragmented science raises urgent governance questions. Drawing on historical and contemporary models, I examine how researchers in the "second ring" of geopolitics can build open scientific frameworks. I argue that defending the elements of global collaboration – academic freedom, transparency, mobility, and inclusive participation – is not an ideological commitment but an operational necessity for science to deliver on its promises.
Professor Robbert Dijkgraaf FRSUniversity of Amsterdam, Netherlands
Professor Robbert Dijkgraaf FRSUniversity of Amsterdam, Netherlands Robbert Dijkgraaf FRS is a distinguished mathematical physicist and academic leader who served as Minister of Education, Culture and Science of the Netherlands. He is currently a Distinguished University Professor at the University of Amsterdam and the President-Elect of the International Science Council, representing the global science community. Before that he led the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. Dijkgraaf’s research focuses on the interface between theoretical physics and mathematics where he contributed to the understanding of string theory, black holes and topological field theories. He served as president of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and the InterAcademy Partnership, the global alliance of science academies. He has received the Spinoza Prize, the highest scientific award in the Netherlands, and has been named a Knight of the Order of the Netherlands Lion. He is also a trained artist, popular lecturer, columnist and writer. |
| 14:00-14:30 |
The scientific advice mechanism: a perspective
The Scientific Advice Mechanism (SAM) plays a critical role in ensuring that European policymaking is informed by robust, independent, and interdisciplinary scientific evidence. This talk offers a perspective on SAM, its operating principles and contribution to high level decision making across the EU. Drawing on experiences from chairing the Group of Chief Scientific Advisors, it reflects on the opportunities and challenges of delivering timely, transparent, and policy relevant advice in an era of rapidly advancing technologies and increasing societal complexity. The talk highlights lessons learned, from fostering trust and scientific integrity to enabling effective engagement between experts, policymakers, and citizens, and outlines future priorities for strengthening evidence informed governance in Europe.
Professor Nicole GrobertUniversity of Oxford, UK
Professor Nicole GrobertUniversity of Oxford, UK Professor Nicole Grobert is Professor of Nanomaterials at the Department of Materials, University of Oxford, and a Fellow of Corpus Christi College. Her research focuses on the controlled manufacturing, processing, and characterisation of advanced nanomaterials, including carbon and non carbon nanostructures engineered for applications in healthcare, energy systems, and materials operating in extreme environments. From 2018 to 2025, she served as a Chief Scientific Advisor to the European Commission, chairing the Group of Chief Scientific Advisors from 2020. Professor Grobert has a long standing commitment to public engagement with science, e.g., she was a Trustee of the Vega Science Trust and in 2025 she joined the board of Trustees of Sense about Science promoting evidence informed dialogue and accessible scientific communication. She is also a founding member and former Chair of the Young Academy of Europe, and the founding member and Chair of the Oxford Advanced Materials Network bringing together academia from across the disciplines, industry and policymakers. Professor Grobert is a vocal advocate for blue skies research and a contributor to the 2030 Manifesto for Europe’s Research Future, championing scientific freedom, interdisciplinary excellence, and Europe’s capacity for transformative discovery. |
| 14:30-14:55 |
Coffee break
|
| 14:55-15:25 |
Science as a global public good: Perspectives from and outlooks for Africa
Since its adoption in 2015, the UN’s Agenda 2030, with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has served as a convenient and powerful narrative for framing the ‘global public good’ role of contemporary science. It has been accompanied by impact strategies that emphasize open access to knowledge, meaningful engagement with societal stakeholders as knowledge partners in the co-creation of actionable knowledge, diversity, equity and inclusion in research, decision making and leadership, and international scientific collaboration. This is true in Africa as elsewhere in the world: despite significant challenges to the implementation capacities of African science systems, SDG-oriented global challenge priorities and open, engaged, equitable, collaborative research approaches pervade national/regional and institutional science and funding policies across the continent. The optimism about a new world order based on common purpose (global challenges) and shared value (leave no one behind) with which Agenda 2030 was launched has given way to alarm about the hopelessly inadequate progress on achieving the SDGs and the cascading threats of a world that now finds itself in so-called polycrisis mode. Pursuing urgent and, preferably, transformative ‘course corrections’ is the new order of the day for both science and society. What such corrections might entail remains unclear, but it does suggest the need to rethink our current understanding of the ‘global public good’ role of science. In Africa this creates an opportunity for science policy makers, funders and other science system leaders to develop the ‘public good’ role of science in African societies, and to do so in ways that reposition African science as a voice of inspiration and influence on the global stage.
Professor Heide HackmannStellenbosch University, South Africa
Professor Heide HackmannStellenbosch University, South Africa Dr Heide Hackmann joined the University of Stellenbosch on 1 July 2024, as a Chair in Science Futures within the Centre for Research on Evaluation, Science and Technology. She holds an MPhil in Contemporary Social Theory from the University of Cambridge in the UK and a PhD in Science and Technology Studies from the University of Twente in the Netherlands. |
| 15:25-15:55 |
Can we sustain science as a global public good in a “wrecking ball” world?
Even before the US-Israeli attacks on Iran, this year’s Munich Security Conference described the world as being at an inflection point with longstanding alliances called into question, the rules-based international order eroding and mounting instability and escalating conflicts across the globe. Indeed, the main report produced ahead of the conference was called “Under Destruction”and it argued that “the world has entered a period of wrecking-ball politics”. The question is therefore how the ideal of science as a global public good can survive in this new world order. I will argue that certain key principles can still guide us when trying to build and maintain resilient national and international research and innovation systems. It may be necessary, and even desirable to achieve "competitiveness", "strategic autonomy", and "security" but they will not come for free. Decisionmakers need to understand the trade-offs of trying to go it alone. Hopefully, such an understanding will allow calmer heads to prevail and create a space for open science to survive, not out of a sense of idealism but from a clear eyed understanding of how research and innovation work in reality.
Professor Maria Leptin FRSPresident of European Research Council
Professor Maria Leptin FRSPresident of European Research Council Maria Leptin is a developmental biologist and geneticist who is the President of the European Research Council (ERC). After her studies in mathematics and biology, Maria Leptin carried out her PhD research at the Basel Institute for Immunology. She then moved to the Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge, became a group leader at the Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology in Tübingen, and professor at the Institute of Genetics, University of Cologne. Before her appointment as ERC President, Leptin was the Director of the European Molecular Biology Organisation (EMBO) in Heidelberg and a research group leader at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory. She is an elected member of numerous scientific academies and an Honorary Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, a Foreign Member of the Royal Society and an international member of the US National Academy of Sciences. |
| 15:55-16:10 |
Coffee break
|
| 16:10-16:55 |
Roundtable: Policy perspectives
Discussion led by Chair, Professor Geoffrey Boulton FRS
Professor Geoffrey Boulton FRSEdinburgh University
Professor Geoffrey Boulton FRSEdinburgh University Geoffrey Boulton OBE FRSE MAE FRS is Regius Professor of Geology Emeritus at Edinburgh University, distinguished for his research in glaciology. He has been a member of the UK Prime Minister’s Council for Science and Technology, chaired the Royal Society’s Science Policy Centre and several of its science reports, including Science as an Open Enterprise. He has been President of the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA) and is a member of the Governing Board of the International Science Council for which he authored its position paper on Science as a Global Public Good.
Professor Lord David Willetts FRSResolution Foundation, UK
Professor Lord David Willetts FRSResolution Foundation, UK The Rt Hon Lord Willetts FRS is the President of the Resolution Foundation. He is Chair of the Regulatory Innovation Office and of the UK Space Agency. He is Chair of the Foundation for Science and Technology and a visiting professor at King’s College, London. He served as the Member of Parliament for Havant (1992-2015), as Minister for Universities and Science (2010-2014) and previously worked at HM Treasury and the No. 10 Policy Unit. Lord Willetts has written widely on economic and social policy. His book “A University Education” is published by Oxford University Press. A second edition of his book “The Pinch” on fairness between the generations was published in 2019.
Professor Robbert Dijkgraaf FRSUniversity of Amsterdam, Netherlands
Professor Robbert Dijkgraaf FRSUniversity of Amsterdam, Netherlands Robbert Dijkgraaf FRS is a distinguished mathematical physicist and academic leader who served as Minister of Education, Culture and Science of the Netherlands. He is currently a Distinguished University Professor at the University of Amsterdam and the President-Elect of the International Science Council, representing the global science community. Before that he led the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. Dijkgraaf’s research focuses on the interface between theoretical physics and mathematics where he contributed to the understanding of string theory, black holes and topological field theories. He served as president of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and the InterAcademy Partnership, the global alliance of science academies. He has received the Spinoza Prize, the highest scientific award in the Netherlands, and has been named a Knight of the Order of the Netherlands Lion. He is also a trained artist, popular lecturer, columnist and writer.
Professor Heide HackmannStellenbosch University, South Africa
Professor Heide HackmannStellenbosch University, South Africa Dr Heide Hackmann joined the University of Stellenbosch on 1 July 2024, as a Chair in Science Futures within the Centre for Research on Evaluation, Science and Technology. She holds an MPhil in Contemporary Social Theory from the University of Cambridge in the UK and a PhD in Science and Technology Studies from the University of Twente in the Netherlands.
Professor Maria Leptin FRSPresident of European Research Council
Professor Maria Leptin FRSPresident of European Research Council Maria Leptin is a developmental biologist and geneticist who is the President of the European Research Council (ERC). After her studies in mathematics and biology, Maria Leptin carried out her PhD research at the Basel Institute for Immunology. She then moved to the Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge, became a group leader at the Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology in Tübingen, and professor at the Institute of Genetics, University of Cologne. Before her appointment as ERC President, Leptin was the Director of the European Molecular Biology Organisation (EMBO) in Heidelberg and a research group leader at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory. She is an elected member of numerous scientific academies and an Honorary Fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences, a Foreign Member of the Royal Society and an international member of the US National Academy of Sciences. |
| 16:55-17:00 |
Closing remarks
|
| 17:00-17:00 |
Close
|