References

¹Díaz S et al. 2019. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for profound change. Science 366, 10.1126/science.aax3100.

²Liu J, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Luck G. 2003. Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature 421:530-533.

³Liu J et al. 2013. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society 18 (2): 26.

⁴Ibid

⁵Dou Y, Bicudo da Silva R F, Yang H, Liu J. 2018. Spillover effect offsets the conservation effort in the Amazon. Journal of Geographical Sciences 28(11): 1715-1732. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1539-0)

⁶Sun J et al. 2018. Importing food damages domestic environment: Evidence from global soybean trade. PNAS 115 (21): 5415-5419.

⁷The World Bank 2020 World Development Indicators https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/world-development-indicators. (Accessed September 29, 2020.) 

⁸Liu J, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Luck G. 2003. Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature 421:530-533.

⁹Kinnunen P et al. 2020. Local food crop production can fulfil demand for less than one-third of the population. Nature Food 1:229-237.

¹⁰Ibid

¹¹Liu J, Yang W, Li S. 2016. Framing ecosystem services in the telecoupled Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.14(1): 27-36.

¹²Ibid

¹³Balmford A et al. 2015. Walk on the Wild Side: Estimating the Global Magnitude of Visits to Protected Areas. PLOS Biology. (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002074) 

¹⁴World Tourism Organisation  https://www.unwto.org/statistics (accessed 2 November 2020)

¹⁵Liu J et al. 2013. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society 18 (2): 26.

¹⁶Ibid

¹⁷Liu J et al. 2007. Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems. Science 317:1513 – 1516.

¹⁸Kliem L et al. 2020. Sustainable Consumption for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: The cases of cotton, soy and lithium. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN), Bonn, Germany.

¹⁹Lazarus E, Lin D, Martindill J, Hardiman J, Pitney L, Galli A. 2015. Biodiversity Loss and the Ecological Footprint of Trade. Diversity 7, 170-191. (doi:10.3390/d7020170)

²⁰Lenzen M, Moran D, Kanemoto K, Foran B, Lobefaro L, Geschke A. 2012. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486: 109-112.

²¹Essl F, Winter M, Pyšek P. 2012. Trade threat could be even more dire. Nature 487:39. 

²²Moran D, Kanemoto K. 2017. Identifying species threat hotspots from global supply chains. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1:0023. 

²³Chaudhary A, Kastner T. 2016. Land use biodiversity impacts embodied in international food trade. Global Environmental Change 38 (2016) 195–204.

²⁴Chaudhary A, Brooks TM. 2019. National Consumption and Global Trade Impacts on Biodiversity. World Development 121:178–187.

²⁵Sun J et al. 2018. Importing food damages domestic environment: Evidence from global soybean trade. PNAS 115 (21): 5415-5419.

²⁶For example, Jayanthakumaran K, Verma R, Liu Y. 2012. CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: A comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy 42:450-460. 

²⁷Dou Y, Bicudo da Silva RF, Yang H, Liu J. 2018. Spillover effect offsets the conservation effort in the Amazon. Journal of Geographical Sciences 28(11): 1715-1732. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1539-0)

²⁸Chung MG, Herzberger A, Frank KA and Liu J. 2019 International tourism dynamics in a globalized world: A social network analysis approach. Journal of Travel Research https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0047287519844834

²⁹Zhao Z, Cai M, Connor T, Chung MG, Liu J. 2020. Metacoupled tourism and wildlife translocations affect synergies and trade-offs among sustainable development goals across spillover systems. Sustainability 12, 7677.

³⁰Sun J, Tong Y, Liu J. 2017. Telecoupled land-use changes in distant countries. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 16(2): 368-376.

³¹Dou Y, Bicudo da Silva RF, Yang H, Liu J. 2018. Spillover effect offsets the conservation effort in the Amazon. Journal of Geographical Sciences 28(11): 1715-1732. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1539-0)

³²Karesh WB, Cook RA, Bennett EL, Newcomb J. 2005. Wildlife Trade and Global Disease Emergence. Emerging Infectious Disease 11(7): 1000–1002.

³³Liu J, Yang W, Li S. 2016. Framing ecosystem services in the telecoupled Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.14(1): 27-36.

³⁴Youm O, Vayssières J, Togola A, Robertson SP, Nwilene FE. 2011. International trade and exotic pests: the risks for biodiversity and African economies. Outlook on AGRICULTURE Vol 40, No 1, 2011, pp 59–70. (doi: 10.5367/oa.2011.0031)

³⁵Haroon A, Basharat M, Khattak AM, Ejaz W. 2019. Internet of Things platform for transparency and traceability of food supply chain. Pp. 13-19 in 2019 IEEE 10th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON) (edited by Chakrabarti S and Chakrabarti HN). 

³⁶Casino F, Kanakaris V, Dasaklis T, Moschuris S, Rachaniotis N. 2019. Modeling food supply chain traceability based on blockchain technology. IFAC PAPERSONLINE. 52 (13): 2728-2733.

³⁷Wang S, Li D, Zhang Y, Chen J. 2019. Smart Contract-Based Product Traceability System in the Supply Chain Scenario. IEEE ACCESS 7: 115122-115133.

³⁸Casino F, Kanakaris V, Dasaklis T, Moschuris S, Rachaniotis N. 2019. Modeling food supply chain traceability based on blockchain technology. IFAC PAPERSONLINE. 52 (13): 2728-2733.

³⁹Baralla G, Pinna A, Corrias G. 2019.  Ensure traceability in European food supply chain by using a blockchain system. 2019 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Engineering for Blockchain (WETSEB 2019), pp. 40-27.

⁴⁰Walsh B. 2011. The New Science of Telecoupling Shows Just How Connected the World Is for Better and for Worse. Time, February 23. https://science.time.com/2011/02/23/the-new-science-of-telecoupling-shows-just-how-connected-the-world-is%E2%80%94for-better-and-for-worse/ (accessed 29 September, 2020).

⁴¹Thiaw I, Steiner A. 2019. ‘Tele-coupling’ and Why Your Choice Matters for the Planet. Thomson Reuters Foundation News, June 17. https://news.trust.org//item/20190617080047-bv0jq/ (accessed 29 September, 2020).

⁴²Dou Y, Bicudo da Silva RF, Yang H, Liu J. 2018. Spillover effect offsets the conservation effort in the Amazon. Journal of Geographical Sciences 28(11): 1715-1732. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1539-0)

⁴³UNEP and FAO. 2020. Un Decade on Ecosystem Restoration https://www.decadeonrestoration.org/ (Accessed September 29, 2020). 

⁴⁴Yang H, Viña A, Tang Y, Zhang J, Wang F, Zhao Z and Liu J. 2017 Range-wide Evaluation of Wildlife Habitat Change: A Demonstration Using Giant Pandas. Biological Conservation 213: 203–209