The range of models used to measure the impact of journals and articles is constantly increasing, though most are based on the level of citations. As a signatory to DORA, the Royal Society offers a variety of journal and article-based metrics.
Transformational Journals
Our four research journals, Proceedings A, Proceedings B, Biology Letters and Interface, are Transformative Journals moving to a fully open access model when 75% of articles are being published open access.
| Journal |
OA research articles published in 2020 |
Total research articles in 2020 |
% of OA in 2020 |
Target % of OA for 2021 |
Target number of OA research articles for 2021 (based on the same Total research articles published as in 2020) |
| Biology Letters |
46 |
186 |
25 |
30 |
55 |
| Interface |
71 |
261 |
27 |
32 |
84 |
| Proceedings A |
47 |
321 |
15 |
20 |
63 |
| Proceedings B |
159 |
564 |
28 |
33 |
187 |
Impact factor
The impact factor is a measure of how often an average article in a journal has been cited. It is calculated by dividing the number of current year citations to source items published in that journal during the previous 2 years.
While the impact factor is a relatively easy measure to calculate and understand, it does have some limitations. Given the highly skewed nature of the citation distribution of a journal's articles, the appropriateness of using a mean has been questioned. Also, most journals contain a significant proportion of articles that are never cited. Such articles can be seen as ‘benefiting’ unfairly from the impact factor of the journal in which they appear.
|
Journal
|
2020 Impact Factor
|
Rank
|
5 Year Impact Factor
|
Cited Half-Life
|
Immediacy Index
|
|
Proceedings A
|
2.704 |
37th out of 73 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
|
3.148 |
20.14 |
0.658 |
|
Proceedings B
|
5.349 |
13th out of 93 in ‘Biology’
|
5.977 |
9.9 |
1.015 |
|
Philosophical Transactions A
|
4.226 |
18th out of 73 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
|
4.542 |
9.6 |
2.106 |
|
Philosophical Transactions B
|
6.237 |
9th out of 93 in ‘Biology’
|
7.828 |
9.7 |
2.887 |
|
Interface
|
4.118 |
19th out of 73 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
|
4.523 |
6.4 |
0.836 |
|
Biology Letters
|
3.703 |
28th out of 93 in ‘Biology’
|
4.228 |
7.5 |
0.815 |
|
Interface Focus
|
3.906 |
26th out of 93 in ‘Biology’
|
4.427 |
4.8 |
1.96 |
|
Open Biology
|
6.411 |
58th out of 298 in ‘Biochemistry and Molecular Biology’
|
5.898 |
3.5 |
0.71 |
|
Royal Society Open Science
|
2.963 |
28th out of 73 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
|
3.44 |
2.5 |
0.665 |
- 5 year impact factor: is the impact factor calculated using a base of 5 years’ worth of cited articles, rather than 2. This gives a fairer picture of journals in fields with slower citation patterns, such as mathematics.
- Cited half-life: the number of years, counting back from the current year, which account for half the total citations received by the cited journal in the current year. This provides a measure of how ‘long-lived’ the articles are in terms of their influence on the literature.
- Immediacy index: the average number of times that an article is cited in the same year it is published. It gives an indication of how topical the material in the journal is.
Eigenfactor
The Eigenfactor gives an indication of the overall contribution of the journal, as a whole, to the literature.
It does this using an algorithm similar to that of Google's ‘PageRank’ to count citations into and out of the journal and to weight them according to the ranking of the source or destination. It uses the Thomson Reuters journal dataset and it is intended to measure how likely a journal is to be used or the amount of time a reader will spend reading it. Large journals rank more highly in the Eigenfactor system than small journals (in contrast to the impact factor, which is independent of size).
|
Journal
|
2020 Eigenfactor
|
Eigenfactor Rank
|
Article Influence
|
Article Influence Rank
|
|
Proceedings A
|
0.01533 |
15th out of 71 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
|
1.094 |
18th out of 71 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
|
|
Proceedings B
|
0.06107 |
3rd out of 93 in ‘Biology’
|
2.071 |
10th out of 93 in ‘Biology’
|
|
Philosophical Transactions A
|
0.0254 |
11th out of 71 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
|
1.406 |
15th out of 71 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
|
|
Philosophical Transactions B
|
0.05573 |
4th out of 93 in ‘Biology’
|
2.656 |
8th out of 93 in ‘Biology’
|
|
Interface
|
0.00448 |
12th out of 71 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
|
1.513 |
12th out of 71 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
|
|
Biology Letters
|
0.01623 |
11th out of 93 in ‘Biology’
|
1.309 |
17th out of 93 in ‘Biology’
|
|
Interface Focus
|
0.02201 |
27th out of 93 in 'Biology' |
1.237 |
18th out of 93 in ‘Biology’
|
|
Open Biology
|
0.01028 |
104th out of 297 in ‘Biochemistry and Molecular Biology’
|
1.542 |
59th out of 297 in ‘Biochemistry and Molecular Biology’
|
|
Royal Society Open Science
|
0.03099 |
13th out of 71 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
|
0.915 |
21st out 71 in ‘Multidisciplinary Sciences’
|
- Article influence: measures the relative importance of the journal on a per-article basis. It is the journal's Eigenfactor Score divided by the fraction of articles published by the journal. That fraction is normalised so that the sum total of articles from all journals is 1. The mean Article Influence Score is 1.00. A score greater than 1.00 indicates that each article in the journal has above-average influence. A score less than 1.00 indicates that each article in the journal has below-average influence.
Scopus metrics
- CiteScore: Very much like the Impact Factor except that it is based on the larger Scopus dataset and uses 3 years of data. It is the number of citations received by a journal in one year to documents published in the three previous years, divided by the number of documents indexed in Scopus published in those same three years.
- Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): Measures contextual citation impact by weighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field. The impact of a single citation is given higher value in subject areas where citations are less likely, and vice versa.
Altmetrics
Altmetrics are non-traditional metrics proposed as an alternative to citation impact metrics.
We use a partner organisation called Altmetric to track and display the online activity around an article. Altmetric track social media sites, newspapers and magazines for mentions of each published article. The aim is to help authors quantify the attention their article is receiving and to help readers establish the articles their peers think are interesting.
The Altmetric ‘doughnut’ can be found on the ‘Details’ tab of each article.
Publication times
We provide information on publication times, which are regularly updated.