1IPBES. 2019 Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Brondizio ES, J. Settele J, Díaz S, and Ngo HT (editors). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany.

2WWF. 2020 Living Planet Report 2020 - Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. Almond REA, Grooten M and Petersen T (Eds). WWF, Gland, Switzerland.

3Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2020 Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Montreal.

4Blanco G et al. 2014 Drivers, Trends and Mitigation. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

5Seddon N et al. 2020 Global recognition of the importance of nature-based solutions to the impacts of climate change. Glob. Sustain. (

6Seddon N, Chausson A, Berry P, Girardin CAJ, Smith A and Turner B. 2020 Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 375. (

7IPCC. 2019 Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems Shukla PR et al (eds). 

8Seddon N et al. 2021 Getting the message right on nature-based solutions to climate change. Global Change Biology. (

9Griscom B et al. 2017 Natural climate solutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 11645–11650. (

10Anderson CM et al. 2019 Natural climate solutions are not enough. Science 363, 933–934. (

11Girardin CAJ et al. 2021 Nature-based Climate Solutions: contribution to peak warming and global cooling. Nature (accepted pending revisions)

12IPCC. 2018 Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Masson-Delmotte V et al (eds). World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 

13Frank D et al. 2015 Effects of climate extremes on the terrestrial carbon cycle: concepts, processes and potential future impacts. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 2861–2880. (

14Turner MG et al. 2020 Climate change, ecosystems and abrupt change: science priorities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1794), p.20190105.

15Royal Society. 2014 Resilience to Extreme Weather, Royal Society, London. Retrieved from  

16Chausson A et al. 2020 Mapping the effectiveness of Nature-based Solutions for climate change adaptation. Glob. Change Biol. (

17Valenzuela RB, Yeo-Chang Y, Park MS and Chun J-N. 2020 Local People’s Participation in Mangrove Restoration Projects and Impacts on Social Capital and Livelihood: A Case Study in the Philippines. Forests 11, 580. (

18Edwards PET, Sutton-Grier AE and Coyle GE. 2013 Investing in nature: restoring coastal habitat blue infrastructure and green job creation. Marine Policy, 38, pp.65-71.

19Oliver TH et al. 2015. Biodiversity and Resilience of Ecosystem Functions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 673–684. (

20Biggs R et al. 2012 Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annual review of environment and resources, 37, 421-448.

21Osuri AM, Gopal A, Raman TRS, Defries R, Cook-Patton SC and Naeem S. 2020 Greater stability of carbon capture in species-rich natural forests compared to species-poor plantations. Environ. Res. Lett. 15. (

22Hutchison C, Gravel D, Guichard F and Potvin C. 2018 Effect of diversity on growth, mortality, and loss of resilience to extreme climate events in a tropical planted forest experiment. Sci. Rep. 8, 15443. (

23Jactel H et al. 2017 Tree diversity drives forest stand resistance to natural disturbances. Curr. For. Rep. 3, 223–243. (

24Isbell I et al. 2017 Linking the influence and dependence of people on biodiversity across scales. Nature 546, 65–72. ( 

25Tuck SL et al. 2016 The value of biodiversity for the functioning of tropical forests: insurance effects during the first decade of the Sabah biodiversity experiment. Proc. R. Soc. B 283. ( 2016.1451) 

26Yachi S and Loreau M. 1999 Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1463 – 1468. ( 

27Strassburg et al. 2020 Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature.

28De Lamo et al. 2020 Strengthening synergies: how action to achieve post-2020 global biodiversity conservation targets can contribute to mitigating climate change. UNEP-WCMC.

29Brancalion PH et al. 2020 Exotic eucalypts: From demonized trees to allies of tropical forest restoration?. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57, 55-66.

30Ohashi H et al. 2019 Biodiversity can benefit from climate stabilization despite adverse side effects of land-based mitigation. Nat. Commun. 10, 5240. (

31Heilmayr R, Echeverría C and Lambin EF. 2020 Impacts of Chilean forest subsidies on forest cover, carbon and biodiversity. Nat. Sustain. 1–9. (

32Scheidel A and Work C. 2018 Forest plantations and climate change discourses: New powers of ‘green’ grabbing in Cambodia. Land Use Policy 77, 9–18. (

33Veldman JW et al. 2019 Comment on “The global tree restoration potential.” Science 366. (

34Vidal J. 2008 John Vidal on the great green land grab. The Guardian. (

35Townsend J, Moola F and Craig M-K. 2020. Indigenous Peoples are critical to the success of nature-based solutions to climate change. FACETS. (

36NbSI. 2020 Nature-based Solutions to Climate Change. Key messages for decision makers in 2020 and beyond. (

37IUCN. 2020 Guidance for using the IUCN Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions: first edition.

38Tilman D and Williams DR. 2021 Preserving Global Biodiversity Requires Rapid Agricultural Improvements. Royal Society. 

39Raworth K. 2017 Doughnut Economics. OUP.