This page is archived

Links to external sources may no longer work as intended. The content may not represent the latest thinking in this area or the Society’s current position on the topic.

Quantifying fluxes and processes in trace-metal cycling at ocean boundaries

09 - 10 December 2015 09:00 - 17:00

Satellite meeting organised by Professor Gideon Henderson FRS, Professor Ed Boyle, Professor Maeve Lohan, Dr Micha Rijkenberg and Dr Géraldine Sarthou.

This workshop will assess the state of understanding of trace metal fluxes at the four ocean boundaries: continents, marine sediments, the atmosphere, and mid-ocean-ridges. It will seek to quantify fluxes for key trace elements, and describe as fully as possible the processes that control them, so that changes to these fluxes in the past and future can be predicted.  It will also identify areas where fluxes remain uncertain, or tracers disagree, and prioritise areas for future research.

There will two sessions of breakout groups. Both sessions will be based around the four ocean boundaries. Attendees will be pre-assigned to groups based on their input before the meeting, with many changing groups between the two sessions. Discussion will be summarised in a paper for each of the four boundaries.

Biographies and abstracts are available below, together with the schedule of talks. Alternatively you can download the draft programme (PDF).

Attending this event

This meeting has already taken place.

This meeting was preceded by a two-day discussion meeting Biological and climatic impacts of ocean trace element chemistry held at the Royal Society, London.

Enquiries: Contact the events team

Organisers

  • Professor Gideon Henderson FRS

    Gideon Henderson FRS became Defra’s Chief Scientific Adviser from October 2019 and is a Professor of Earth Sciences at the Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford.

    He is also a Senior Research Fellow at University College, Oxford and an Adjunct Associate Research Scientist at the Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University.

    In 2013, he was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society. His research uses geochemistry to understand surface earth processes, particularly those relating to climate, the ocean, and the carbon cycle.

  • Professor Ed Boyle, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA

    Professor Boyle (PhD, '76, MIT/Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; BA, '71, University of California, San Diego) is a marine geochemist involved in the study of the natural and anthropogenic metals in the ocean and ice age paleoclimate His research includes studies of past ocean circulation patterns based on the chemistry of microfossils in oceanic sediments, control of late Pleistocene carbon dioxide, and historical trace element variability derived from archives such as corals, sediments and ice cores. He also investigates the trace element chemistry of rivers and estuaries. In particular, he studies the variability of oceanic iron and lead derived from atmospheric transport of anthropogenic emissions and mineral dust, and the evolving fate of atmospherically transported pollutant lead in the ocean. Professor Boyle is a member of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences (2008).

  • OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

    Professor Maeve Lohan, University of Plymouth, UK

    Professor Maeve Lohan is a marine biogeochemist whose research interests focus on trace metals biogeochemistry with particular reference to bioactive metals (iron, zinc, and cobalt). Her research examines chemical, biological, and physical processes which affect trace element distributions and behaviour in both coastal and open ocean regimes. This research combines distribution, chemical speciation studies, trace metal uptake by phytoplankton and analytical chemistry and is approached from two directions: field measurements and laboratory studies. Maeve is currently co-chair of the Standard and Intercalibration Committee of the GEOTRACE programme.

  • Dr Micha Rijkenberg, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, The Netherlands

    Micha Rijkenberg is a chemical oceanographer at the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research and a member of the Scientific Steering Committee for the international GEOTRACES programme. He has worked as a research fellow at the National Oceanography Centre (UK) and the National Institute for Water and Atmosphere (NZ). Micha’s research interests involve the distribution, chemical speciation and biological availability of trace metals. He is especially interested in iron because low concentrations of dissolved iron limit primary productivity, and nitrogen fixation, in large parts of the modern global oceans. Micha has organised and led several GEOTRACES research cruises to the West Atlantic Ocean, the Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea. He is involved in a major international GEOTRACES effort in the Arctic Ocean in 2015.

  • Dr Géraldine Sarthou, Laboratoire des sciences de l'environnement marin, France

    Géraldine Sarthou earned her PhD in marine geochemistry at Paul Sabatier University (Toulouse, France) in 1996 and performed postdoctoral research in the UK (University of Liverpool), Germany (GEOMAR, Kiel), and France (LEMAR UMR 6539, Plouzané). She is currently a research scientist at LEMAR and her research interests include the quantification of the sources and sinks of trace metals (mainly Fe, Cu and Mn) and the interactions between these metals and the food web. Her work is based on analytical development of new trace metal technics, observations in many regions of the world oceans and process studies in the laboratory with phytoplankton model species. She has participated in 14 oceanographic cruises, co-supervised 6 PhD students (3 in co-tutelle with Australia) and 7 Post-docs, and is co-author of 42 peer-review publications.

Schedule

09:15 - 10:00 Mid-ocean ridges and hydrothermal fluxes

Fluxes of heat and water at mid-ocean ridges are partitioned between focussed and diffuse flow along mid-ocean ridge axes and through the flanks of mid-ocean ridges.  While the axial heat and volume fluxes are a small proportion of the whole, geophysically, they are of particular interest to marine geochemistry for two reasons.  First, it is only at high temperature vents that a number of TEIs are mobilised into solution and, hence, can be released into the ocean interior.  Second, the turbulent mixing processes active in deep sea hydrothermal plumes are so extensive, it has been estimated that the residence time for the entire deep ocean volume with respect to entrainment into hydrothermal plumes may be directly comparable to the timescales for thermohaline circulation. Thus, the possibility arises that processes associated with deep sea hydrothermal venting might impact upon global scale biogeochemical budgets. My talk will discuss these possibilities, with particular reference to Fe, an essential micronutrient, which is approximately 1 million fold enriched in hydrothermal fluids compared to deep ocean seawater. The presentation will draw upon the latest finding from two directly relevant programmes – SCOR Working Group 135 and the US GEOTRACES East Pacific Zonal Transect.

Dr Christopher R German MBE, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, USA

10:00 - 10:45 Discerning the mechanisms and measuring the rates of trace metal release from ocean sediments

All seafloor sediments undergo diagenetic reactions with the potential to mobilise constituent metals and promote the release of biologically essential trace metal micronutrients to the ocean. Quantifying this input and understanding how it changes are vital goals for simulating past and future ocean conditions. In this talk, I will explain the need to discern the mechanisms responsible for the release of trace metals to the ocean, in addition to measuring the rates of these processes, to effectively parameterise models of ocean primary production and climate. I will present the enduring evidence and our empirical basis for incorporating sedimentary iron (Fe) fluxes into ocean biogeochemical models, followed by recent evidence for additional processes that govern the release of Fe from sediments – processes which are presently ill quantified and unaccounted for. The challenges outlined for benthic Fe flux quantification concern other bio-essential trace metals too, such as manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn). Pore water profiles provide a first-order perspective to evaluate flux, while more intensive micronutrient and chemical tracer observations through the ocean’s bottom boundary layer might yield a better measure of the net flux to link with ocean transect data. In any case, without mechanistic knowledge of trace metal mobilisation and transfer to the ocean, a more accurate representation and projection of these inputs in ocean biogeochemical models is a difficult task. To this end, GEOTRACES-linked process studies are now emerging, and promise to bring exciting new knowledge and opportunities in these areas.

Dr Will Homoky, University of Oxford, UK

11:15 - 12:00 Fluxes across the continental shelf

Continental shelves are a highly productive part of the oceans, playing a key role for both marine life and human activities. We know that they can easily be affected by a changing climate. They are also a particularly challenging system in marine trace element chemistry. The shelves are very strong sources for trace elements due to river runoff, dry deposition, submarine groundwater discharge (SGD), pore water fluxes, redox and salinity gradients, bioirrigation, and many other processes. These source terms, some of them extremely variable in space and time, are encountered by nearly equally strong and variable sink terms, like bioproductivity, precipitation reactions or fishing, just to name a few. The net flux is therefore a difference of two very large and variable terms, resulting in large uncertainties. In addition, discussing and quantifying individual parts of this budget is often problematic due to slightly different uses of terminology: is advective pore water flux the same as SGD? What are point sources, what are diffuse sources (and where does SGD stand here)? Where do you draw a boundary between suspended particle transport and sediment transport? This talk will aim to highlight a few of the main sources and sinks, uncertainties in their determination and challenges, as well as identifying areas where a closer look at definitions might help to improve our understanding of fluxes across the continental shelf.

Dr Walter Geibert, Alfred Wegener Institute, Germany

12:00 - 12:45 Isotope tracing of boundary fluxes

There is huge scope in using stable and radiogenic isotope systems to trace and quantify elemental fluxes to and from the ocean. The use of Nd isotopes as a sedimentary source tracer is well known, while new precise measurements of Pb isotopes in seawater reveal the changing contributions of Pb from natural and anthropogenic dust sources (Bridgestock et al., 2015). Increasingly, the spotlight has shifted towards the information recorded by stable metal isotope systems, like Fe and Zn. The dissolved isotopic composition of Fe in the Atlantic has been used to differentiate four iron sources to this basin, with the aerosol dust signature of Sub-Saharan Africa calculated to be of particular significance (Conway & John, 2012). Quantifying oceanic Fe sources is driven by its importance as a (co-)limiting micronutrient. Zinc may be of similar importance to Fe in controlling the efficiency of global carbon cycling, but behaves rather differently in the oceanic realm, and less is known about its oceanic cycle. New data will be presented, highlighting the importance of an output of light Zn isotopes to organic-rich continental margin sediments to the global mass balance of Zn.

Dr Susan Little, Imperial College London, UK

14:00 - 14:45 Challenges in modelling boundary fluxes and in situ reaction rates

Observations of the distributions of trace elements and isotopes (TEIs) in the ocean have been used to infer boundary fluxes and in situ reaction rates. Because the distributions of reactive (non-conservative) properties depend on both physical transport as well as in situ biogeochemical processes, diagnosing the former from the distributions of conservative TEIs (whether they be transient or radioactive) can lead to estimates of the unknown boundary fluxes and in situ reaction rates. Such an approach has been used in the past to obtain relatively robust first order estimates, but some care should be exercised in recognising its limitations. I present a simple example of this.

The challenges in this approach may be divided into two categories

(1) Sampling adequacy: is the spatial-temporal coverage internally sufficient to resolve the relevant scales and the end-member concentrations? Have the correct properties been measured and to adequate accuracy?

(2) Model competence: does the model (whether diagnostic or prognostic) incorporate the appropriate physical mechanics? Have the biogeochemical processes been correctly parameterised?

The first challenge is a function of experiment design, which is in turn governed by cost and logistics. In reality, for GEOTRACES the die is cast so it becomes a question of tailoring objectives to the observations at hand. The second challenge raises an important synthesis strategy for GEOTRACES: making sure that geochemists and physicists work together to make the most of this exciting dataset.

Dr William Jenkins, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, USA

Chair

Dr Alex Baker, University of East Anglia, UK

Dr Phoebe Lam, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA

Dr Silke Severmann, Rutgers University, New Jersey, USA

Professor Rachel Mills, University of Southampton, UK

11:00 - 11:30 Lessons from SOLAS programme

Dr Cecile Guieu, Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche-sur-Mer, CNRS-University Paris VI, France

11:30 - 12:00 River input to seawater – lessons from the Global Rivers Observatory

Dr Bernhard Peuker-Ehrenbrink, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, USA

Chair

Professor Bill Landing, Florida State University, USA

Professor Andrea Koschinsky, Germany

Professor William Berelson, University of Southern California, USA