Vaccines and antimicrobial resistance: from science to policy
Science+ meeting organised by Professor Calman MacLennan and Dame Sally Davies FMedSci FRS.
Vaccines for humans and animals represent an attractive means to counter the growing global pandemic of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) but are only available against a few key bacterial pathogens. The meeting will review the science of how vaccines reduce AMR, identify research gaps in developing AMR vaccines and discuss policy in advancing development and equitable deployment of such vaccines.
The schedule of talks and speaker biographies will be available soon. Speaker abstracts will be available closer to the meeting date.
Attending this event
This event is intended for researchers in relevant fields.
- Free to attend, an optional lunch is available to purchase during registration or on the day
- Online attendance available. Please register using the above link
- Advance registration is essential
Enquiries: contact the Scientific Programmes team
Schedule
Chair
Dr Mateusz Hasso-Agopsowicz, World Health Organization, Switzerland
Dr Mateusz Hasso-Agopsowicz, World Health Organization, Switzerland
Dr Mateusz Hasso-Agopsowicz is a Technical Officer in the Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals (IVB) at the World Health Organization (WHO). He holds a PhD in Vaccine Immunology from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM). Dr Mateusz leads theme areas on the role of vaccines in reducing antimicrobial resistance (AMR), development of vaccine-microarray patches (MAPs) and enteric vaccines at the WHO. His work prioritises and facilitates the development of vaccines and delivery systems that will be readily used in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Dr Mateusz has assessed the pipeline of vaccines in development and their value to reduce AMR to inform vaccine prioritisation during development, introduction, and use, and the selection of vaccines for the Gavi Vaccine Investment Strategy. He has also published and disseminated the WHO's strategy on leveraging vaccines to reduce AMR and antibiotic use. His research activities for vaccines with potentially high impact on AMR include research roadmaps, value proposition assessments, and documents summarising vaccines preferred product characteristics.
09:05-09:30 |
The need for sustainable access to effective antibiotics and the role of vaccines
Reducing the need for antibiotics is an effective way to tackling the problem of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Vaccines, along with water and sanitation, and infection prevention and control can play a central role in lowering the burden of AMR. Expanding coverage of existing vaccines (PCV, rotavirus, typhoid) and introducing new vaccines (RSV, TB, Klebsiella pneumoniae) are among the most promising options and should considered as part of the crafting of global targets in reducing the burden of AMR. Professor Ramanan Laxminarayan, Princeton University, One Health Trust, USA
Professor Ramanan Laxminarayan, Princeton University, One Health Trust, USALaxminarayan is founder and Director of the One Health Trust (formerly known as the Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy or CDDEP) in Washington, DC and New Delhi, a senior research scholar at Princeton University, and Director of the WHO Collaborating Center on Antimicrobial Resistance in New Delhi. He is an Affiliate Professor at the University of Washington, Senior Associate at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and a visiting professor at the University of Strathclyde in Scotland and the National University of Singapore Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health. Laxminarayan chairs the board of GARD-P, a global product development partnership created by the World Health Organisation, that aims to develop and deliver new treatments for bacterial infections. He is founder and board chair at HealthCubed, which works to improve access to healthcare and diagnostics worldwide. |
---|---|
09:30-09:45 |
Discussion
|
09:45-10:15 |
The economic burden of AMR
Juan Pablo Uribe: Antimicrobials have become part of the infrastructure of modern society; but their longevity is under threat, compromising our ability to treat many health conditions cost-effectively and quickly. In 2017, the World Bank estimated that by 2050, left unchecked, AMR could wipe away 3.8 percent of global gross domestic product each year and push 28 million people into poverty (World Bank 2017). Ongoing efforts have highlighted that the socioeconomic burden of AMR remains substantial. However, the challenge posed by AMR is not universally intractable; from improving handwashing in health care settings to banning the use of antimicrobials as growth promoters in agriculture, there is much that can be done. Supporting investments in health system strengthening, such as infection, prevention and control, is an area where the World Bank, through technical assistance and financing, can positively impact the fight to preserve antimicrobials. Currently, the World Bank finances and collaborates with governments worldwide across a portfolio of more than 60 projects that are addressing AMR. In addition, the World Bank brings a comparative advantage in its multisectoral approach, and has identified 20 intervention areas (across the Health, Water, Agriculture and Food and Environment sectors) that be advanced through, its financing, to better address AMR in the coming years. Anthony McDonnell: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the world’s top public health threats. It results in 1.3 million deaths every year—and without concerted action, this number is set to increase. Estimates of the economic burden of AMR have found that GDP would be trillions of dollars lower in 2050 if these trends continue. However, these estimates were made almost a decade ago, before detailed estimates of the health burden of AMR, and when our understanding of the macro-economic impact of infectious diseases was less clear. Dr Juan Pablo Uribe, World Bank, USA
Dr Juan Pablo Uribe, World Bank, USAJuan Pablo Uribe is the Global Director for Health, Nutrition and Population at the World Bank and Director of the Global Financing Facility for Women, Children and Adolescents (GFF). Previously, from 2018 to 2019, Dr Uribe served as Minister of Health and Social Protection of Colombia. Between 2009 and 2011, he was the World Bank´s Health Sector Manager for East Asia and the Pacific. In his vast career, first as a medical doctor specialized in public health and public administration, and later in both public and private leading health sector organizations, Mr. Uribe has contributed significantly to public health policies, health care delivery and health systems development. Anthony McDonnell, Center for Global Development, UK
Anthony McDonnell, Center for Global Development, UKAnthony is a senior policy analyst in Center for Global Development's (CGD) global health policy team. He leads CGD’s work on antimicrobial resistance (AMR), including modelling the macro-economic burden of AMR and was previously the technical lead of CGD’s working group, A New Grand Bargain to Improve the Antimicrobial Market for Human Health. He has also led projects analysing the COVID-19 vaccine portfolio, examining policy interventions to protect the supply chains for pharmaceuticals from COVID-19-induced shocks, and contributed to the international Decision Support Initiative’s work in Ethiopia. Before joining CGD, he was Head of Economic Research for the UK’s Independent Review into AMR which was set up by the UK government and the Wellcome Trust; led a Wellcome Trust project examining how it could fund more economic research; a research associate at ODI working on the political economy of why governments role out health services in LMICs, (particularly those aimed at reaching the left behind); and a senior health economist at the University of Oxford, modelling the cost of malaria interventions. |
10:15-10:30 |
Discussion
|
10:30-11:00 |
Break
|
11:00-11:30 |
Scientific evidence for how vaccines reduce AMR
The escalating burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) necessitates a multifaceted intervention strategy. The WHO Global Action Plan on AMR emphasises the critical role of vaccines in mitigating AMR by reducing infection rates, antibiotic usage, and the transmission of resistant genes. Despite their potential, the impact of vaccines has been consistently underestimated and underutilised. Data collected from randomised controlled trials and observational studies demonstrate that the use of existing vaccines against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Salmonella typhi can reduce the prevalence of drug-resistant pathogens. There is evidence that the use of existing vaccines and those that are in development can significantly reduce antibiotic use associated with treating syndromes caused by vaccine-targeted pathogens. In this presentation, Dr O’Brien will give a summary of the role of vaccines in reducing AMR, highlighting key evidence and recommendations to ensure that vaccines are fully utilised as tools to tackle AMR. Dr Kate O'Brien, WHO, Switzerland
Dr Kate O'Brien, WHO, SwitzerlandDr Kate O’Brien is Director of the Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals Department at the World Health Organization. She leads WHO’s vaccine and immunization strategy and implementation to advance the vision of a world where everyone, everywhere, at every age, fully benefits from vaccines for good health and wellbeing. The Department works across the vaccine and immunisation value chain (vaccine development to programme implementation), leveraging the work of WHO staff at country, regional and global level to support country programme impact and global coordination. Dr O’Brien is a Canadian with training as a pediatric infectious disease physician, epidemiologist, and vaccine clinical trialist [BSc, University of Toronto (Canada); MDCM, McGill University (Canada); MPH, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (USA)]. Dr O’Brien’s career has focused on vaccine equity, working through vaccine clinical trials, epidemiology studies and innovative policy and strategy initiatives to accelerate life-saving vaccine introductions and scale up in low- and middle-income countries. |
11:30-11:45 |
Discussion
|
11:45-12:15 |
Technologies for AMR vaccine development
During the last 40 years, several innovative technologies allowed development and licensure of previously impossible vaccines. These include glyco-conjugation, reverse vaccinology, structure-based antigen design of subunit and nanoparticle-based vaccines, mRNA vaccines and novel adjuvants. In this period outer membrane vesicles (OMVs or GMMas) -based vaccines also gained access to phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials and represent a promising and accessible approach for bacterial vaccines. The approach that Professor Rappuoli and team currently use in their laboratory is the so-called reverse vaccine 2.0. In this approach Professor Rappuoli and team start from PBMCs isolated from convalescent donors, they single cell sort the donor’s memory B cells and they select those cells that produce monoclonal antibodies able to kill, opsonise or prevent host cell binding of target bacteria. The antigens recognised by the most potent and broadly cross-reactive human monoclonals are selected for vaccine development, while the monoclonal antibodies can be used for passive immunisation to prevent and cure the disease. Dr Rino Rappuoli, Novartis Vaccines, Italy
Dr Rino Rappuoli, Novartis Vaccines, ItalyRino Rappuoli is Global Head Research and Development at Novartis Vaccines and is based in Siena, Italy. He earned his PhD in Biological Sciences at the University of Siena and has served as visiting scientist at Rockefeller University in New York and Harvard Medical School in Boston. Prior to the present position he was head R&D of Sclavo and then head of vaccine research and Chief Scientific Officer of Chiron Corporation. Several molecules he worked with became part of licensed vaccines. These include: CRM197 used in H.influenzae, N.meningitidis, and pneumococcus vaccines; PT9K/129G, a genetically detoxified pertussis toxin used for an acellular vaccine against pertussis; the first conjugate vaccine against meningococcus C and later against meningococcus ACYW; the MF59 adjuvant used in seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines and the FHBP, NadA and NHBA antigens derived from the genome of meningococcus B that made possible the development of Bexsero. He was elected member of the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO). Awards conferred include: Paul Ehrlich and Ludwig Darmstaedter Prize (1991), the Gold Medal by the Italian President (2005), the Albert B. Sabin Gold Medal (2009), the Lifetime Achievement Award from the Institute of Human Virology in Maryland (2010), and the Excellence Award from the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (2011). In 2013 he was nominated third most influential person worldwide in the field of vaccines (Terrapin). He has introduced several novel scientific concepts (genetic detoxification, 1987, cellular microbiology, 1996; reverse vaccinology, 2000; pangenome, 2005, structural vaccinology, 2008). |
12:15-12:30 |
Discussion
|
13:30-14:00 |
Pneumococcal and typhoid vaccine AMR impact
Richard Adegbola: In the global fight against Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), a recognised "top 10 threat to global health", the intersection of vaccines and AMR emerges as a crucial point. This presentation aims to elucidate the pivotal role played by pneumococcal vaccines in deepening our understanding of how vaccines can shape antimicrobial resistance. Within the broader context of "Vaccines and Antimicrobial Resistance- from Science to Policy", this discussion sheds light on the beneficial impact of pneumococcal vaccines in tackling the escalating threat of resistance. Commencing with an exploration of the current state of pneumococcal disease burden, the presentation identifies specific mechanisms through which pneumococcal vaccines influence bacterial resistance. Evidence suggests a decline in antimicrobial resistant pneumococcal disease and nasopharyngeal carriage following the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. Vaccines can reduce pneumococcal resistance by curtailing the carriage of antimicrobial-resistant serotypes. This not only safeguards the vaccinated population but also prevents disease transmission and diminishes antibiotic resistance through an overall reduction in antibiotic use. Nevertheless, challenges such as serotype replacement, vaccine equity, and vaccination coverage demand attention. The presentation underscores the significance of formulating pertinent policies to harness the full potential of pneumococcal vaccines in mitigating antimicrobial resistance. By bridging the gap between scientific advancements and actionable policy measures, the discussion advocates for a collaborative approach involving researchers, policymakers, and healthcare professionals. Ultimately, antimicrobial resistance is a global threat that must be addressed through multiple strategies, including national vaccination programmes, antimicrobial stewardship, and ongoing surveillance. Professor Farah Qamar, The Aga Khan University, Pakistan
Professor Farah Qamar, The Aga Khan University, PakistanProfessor Qamar is a clinical researcher with over 15 years of experience. Her most notable achievements include spearheading the outbreak investigation of XDR typhoid in Hyderabad, Pakistan, and introducing the newly approved Typhoid conjugate vaccine (TCV) into the national immunization program. Her work has been translated into global policy. She has served on multiple national and international advisory boards, Professor Farah's expertise in clinical research has significantly impacted infectious diseases and global health policies. With nearly 100 publications and active participation in global health initiatives, she has earned the Presidential Medal of Excellence, highlighting her significant contributions to public health. Professor Richard Adegbola, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Infectious Diseases Development, Global Health Program, USA
Professor Richard Adegbola, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Infectious Diseases Development, Global Health Program, USA
Richard Adegbola joined the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2009 as Senior Program Officer, Pneumonia Clinical Studies. He has over 20 years of research experience in infections of the tropics particularly, pneumonia and meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. At the foundation, his role is taking pneumonia research findings to policy, implementation and evaluation for impact. He is responsible for vaccine impact studies, including impact evaluations for pneumococcal and meningococcal conjugate vaccines and the maternal immunization program, and for studies of the many causes of pneumonia in the developing world.
Prior to joining the Gates Foundation, he was Head of the Bacterial Diseases Programme at the UK MRC Laboratories in The Gambia. In addition to his MRC appointment he was a member of WHO Meningitis Vaccine Project Advisory Group and Vice Chair of EDCTP Board at The Hague. He was awarded the title and status of Honorary Visiting Professor in the Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation by University of Leicester in England in 2005 and served as a member of the Gambia Government Inter-Agency Committee for immunization and member of National Polio Expert Committee for The Gambia from 2001 to 2009. |
---|---|
14:00-14:15 |
Discussion
|
14:15-14:45 |
Vaccine impact against AMR in the food chain/aquaculture
Roberto La Ragione: Antibiotics are critical for treating infections in livestock and poultry. However, the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance is a major global health threat. Therefore, novel and practical alternatives to antibiotics are urgently required. Vaccines are one such alternative, which have the potential to reduce the emergence and spread of resistance by preventing infections and thereby reducing the need to use antibiotics to treat infections. Moreover, vaccines are essential for improving animal health and welfare, whilst safeguarding human health and global economies. Globally, vaccines are widely used to prevent a range of infections in animals, and a number of studies have demonstrated that their use in animals can lead to significant reductions in antibiotic use, alongside providing health, welfare and productivity benefits. Therefore, the development of new vaccines for use in animals is essential to help reduce the use of antibiotics and the emergence, spread and persistence of resistance. Clearly, veterinary vaccines are a promising alternative to antibiotics and have the potential to improve animal health, welfare, and safeguard food production. However, a number of factors, including costs and administration methodologies have hampered vaccine use in some sectors. Therefore, further research and development is required to realise the potential of vaccines as alternatives to antibiotics. This presentation will focus on the development of vaccines to reduce antibiotic use and associated resistance in livestock and poultry. Duncan Colquhoun: Aquaculture is the fastest growing food-producing sector in the world and Norway is the leading producer of farmed Atlantic salmon worldwide, with over 1.6 million tons produced in 2022. Since its start in the late 1960s, expansion of the fish farming industry in Norway has not been without biological problems. During the early years, serious bacterial infections caused significant losses. Large quantities of antibiotics were prescribed, peaking at almost 50 tonnes of active antibacterial substances used in production of less than 100,000 tonnes of farmed salmon in 1987. AMR to several antibiotic classes was rapidly discovered. However, following development and rapid, widespread adoption of effective vaccines against the major bacterial diseases in the late ‘80s and ‘90s, antibiotic use fell dramatically. All salmon farmed in Norway are now vaccinated against as many as six bacterial pathogens. Only 425 kg antibiotics were used in Norwegian aquaculture (all fish species) in 2022. While this low antibiotic use is undoubtedly due to the success of available vaccines and recognition of the dangers of AMR development, negative consumer perception relating to antibiotic use in farmed fish may also be an important influence. AMR is now only very rarely identified amongst fish pathogenic bacteria in Norway. This presentation will introduce the main bacterial diseases in intensive Norwegian salmon aquaculture, the vaccines and vaccination strategies used to combat these challenges and the limited AMR identified over the years. Antibiotics are critical for treating infections in livestock and poultry. However, the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance is a major global health threat. Therefore, novel and practical alternatives to antibiotics are urgently required. Vaccines are one such alternative, which have the potential to reduce the emergence and spread of resistance by preventing infections and thereby reducing the need to use antibiotics to treat infections. Moreover, vaccines are essential for improving animal health and welfare, whilst safeguarding human health and global economies. Professor Duncan Colquhoun, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Norway
Professor Duncan Colquhoun, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, NorwayDuncan J Colquhoun BSc (Hons), MSc, PhD is a senior researcher at the Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo. From 2013-2023 he also held an adjunct Professor position at the University of Bergen. After graduating MSc in Aquatic Pathobiology from the Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Scotland he gained his PhD on bacterial virulence and vaccine development, at the Norwegian School of Veterinary Science in Oslo. He has over 28 years’ experience in diagnostics and research relating to bacterial pathogens of fish. His work focuses mainly on taxonomic studies and molecular epidemiology of bacterial diseases important in Norwegian aquaculture, with current focus on Tenacibaculum spp., Moritella viscosa, Aeromonas salmonicida, Yersinia ruckeri and Pasteurella spp. Professor Roberto La Ragione, University of Surrey, UK
Professor Roberto La Ragione, University of Surrey, UKProfessor Roberto La Ragione is a veterinary microbiologist with a particular interest in zoonotic bacterial pathogens of livestock, poultry and companion animals. His current research focuses on understanding the pathobiology of zoonotic pathogens, antimicrobial resistance, and the development of novel intervention strategies, including diagnostics, vaccines and probiotics. Professor Roberto has published over 200 peer reviewed publications in the area of veterinary microbiology and is a member of a number of scientific advisory committees. Professor Roberto is currently a Professor of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology in the School of Veterinary Medicine and Head of the School of Biosciences at the University of Surrey. |
14:45-15:00 |
Discussion
|
15:00-15:30 |
break
|
15:30-16:00 |
The manufacturers' perspective
Annaliesa Anderson: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a significant global health threat, with over one million global deaths attributed to difficult-to-treat bacterial infections in 20191. Vaccines are well-positioned for helping to address this challenge by providing protection against infectious diseases that might otherwise result in antibiotic use — or misuse. Vaccines that target bacterial and viral infections each have a role to play. For example, pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) such as PCV13 is estimated to have prevented more than 175-million cases of IPD and over 600,000 deaths globally in children under five years of age alone between 2010 and 20192. Influenza vaccines prevent antibiotic misuse, in addition to bacterial superinfections that can result from the viral insult, thus resulting in an inverse relationship between influenza vaccine coverage and circulating antimicrobial resistance3. Despite this positive outlook, much more needs to be done to utilize the advantage of vaccines in AMR prevention. This presentation will focus on progress towards advancing vaccines to help answer this call-to-action.
Frédéric Descamps: There is more and more pressure, implementation measures and incentives to reduce antimicrobial use in food-producing animals in the European Union (EU) (and elsewhere); accordingly, the use of antimicrobials in food-producing animals has significantly decreased in EU in the recent past. On the other hand, it is widely recognized and reported that veterinary vaccines may contribute to reduce antimicrobial use and indirectly reduce the risk of antimicrobial selection and/or antimicrobial resistance (AMR) development. The vaccines against bacterial infections and immunosuppressive viruses are especially relevant in this regard. The presentation will briefly review the current status and industry trends relative to the development and availability of vaccines that may be of interest in that context. The specificities of the veterinary vaccine industry (versus human vaccine industry) will be summarized. Relevant regulatory requirements will be shortly described. Possible next steps towards the development of veterinary vaccines which may play a role in the reduction of antimicrobial use and AMR will then be discussed, together with the technical and regulatory challenges faced by the industry. Clearly, this is a topic of growing interest from a regulatory, public health and industry standpoint and support for innovation in the area will be important. Dr Annaliesa Anderson, Pfizer, USA
Dr Annaliesa Anderson, Pfizer, USADr Anderson is the Senior Vice President and Head of Vaccine Research & Development at Pfizer. She leads an organization of approximately a thousand scientists, clinicians and professional staff, and has over 30 years of pharmaceutical research experience. She earned her PhD in biological sciences from the University of Warwick, England, and has contributed to the research and development of a multitude of vaccines, including for human papilloma virus while at Merck, and for pneumococcal disease, meningococcal disease, COVID-19, and respiratory syncytial virus at Pfizer. During the COVID-19 pandemic, she helped lead the development of an antiviral therapy for COVID-19, and currently leads the strategic development of an extensive vaccine portfolio for diseases including influenza, C. difficile infection, Group B Streptococcus, and many others. Dr Frédéric Descamps, Zoetis, Belgium
Dr Frédéric Descamps, Zoetis, BelgiumFrédéric Descamps graduated as Veterinarian from the Faculty of Liège, Belgium, and obtained his PhD on the pathogenesis and immunology of Microsporum canis in cats in the same faculty. He has been working in the field of Veterinary Regulatory Affairs since 2003, first in the public sector where he has been acting as Senior Assessor at the Belgian Medicine Agency and as Belgian alternate CVMP member at the European Medicines Agency. Then he moved to the Veterinary pharmaceutical Industry in 2011. He is now Director of Regulatory Affairs at Zoetis. He is also Chair of the Biological Working Party of AnimalHealthEurope. His primary responsibility is to develop new biological products (vaccines in particular) and maintain existing products on the market. |
16:00-16:15 |
Discussion
|
16:15-16:45 |
Poster session
|
16:45-17:00 |
Discussion
|
Chair
Erica Westwood, International Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Solutions, Denmark
Erica Westwood, International Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Solutions, Denmark
Erica Westwood is a global public health specialist and programme manager, with over 10 years of experience working in infectious disease programmes for low- and middle-income country settings. She is currently a Senior Science Advisor at ICARS, where she oversees the development of intervention and implementation research projects and global health partnerships to develop contextually-specific and sustainable solutions for AMR. She has a special interest in working with vulnerable populations and supporting equitable health solutions. Erica holds a Bachelor’s of Health Sciences (honours) from the University of Calgary, a Master of Science in Global Health from McMaster University in Canada, and an Executive Master of Business Administration (honours) from Quantic School of Business and Technology. Previously, Erica has worked in AMR research and development fund management and public health consulting for governments, industry and multilateral organisations.
09:00-09:30 |
Translating science on AMR and vaccines into policy
|
---|---|
09:30-09:45 |
Discussion
|
09:45-10:15 |
AMR: what can we learn from developing vaccines against epidemic and pandemic threats?
Both the rising number of antimicrobial resistant superbugs and the increasing cadence of emerging pandemic threats are acute and urgent global health risks. Tackling them requires sustained, focussed international collaboration at all levels, from community health workers, to health and social policymakers, to innovative scientists. The parallels between vaccine development for epidemic or pandemic preparedness and efforts to combat rising antimicrobial resistance can enhance and accelerate solutions. CEPI’s 100 Days Mission - a plan for the world to able to develop vaccines and medical other countermeasures within 100 days of a new pandemic threat being recognised – has lessons for the world’s battle to stem the rise in antimicrobial resistance. Learning from each other, we can fight superbugs and epidemics together. Dr Richard Hatchett, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), Norway
Dr Richard Hatchett, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), NorwayRichard J Hatchett, MD, is Chief Executive Officer of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), a partnership of public, private, philanthropic and civil organizations that supports the development of vaccines against high priority public health threats and technology platforms to allow the rapid development of vaccines against emerging infectious diseases such as COVID-19. Dr Hatchett was previously the acting Director of the U.S. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) and served as Director of Medical Preparedness Policy on the Homeland and National Security Councils under Presidents Bush and Obama, respectively. He received his medical degree from Vanderbilt and completed clinical training in internal medicine and medical oncology at Cornell and Duke. |
10:15-10:30 |
Discussion
|
10:30-11:00 |
Break
|
11:00-11:30 |
AMR vaccines global perspective
Vaccines, as well other alternative products, can help minimize the need for antibiotics by preventing and controlling infectious diseases in animal populations (i.e., poultry, swine, cattle, aquatic animals, etc.). Various studies have demonstrated that their animal agricultural use can lead to significant reductions in antibiotic consumption, making them promising alternatives to antibiotics. To be widely used in food producing animals, vaccines have to be safe, effective, easy to use, and cost‑effective. Many current vaccines fall short in one or more of these respects. Scientific advancements may allow many of these limitations to be overcome, but progress is highly funding‑dependent. In a world which numerous competing priorities and scarce public resources, it is it is of paramount importance to identify those areas of potentially greatest impact first, as well as to foster synergies to mobilise private investments into vaccine development and implementation. The World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) has released a series of documents prioritising diseases on which vaccines could reduce antimicrobial use in animals, providing also outputs from expert panel discussions regarding opportunities, challenges, needs, new approaches and potential solutions for the development of such vaccines. This talk will provide an overall view of priorities, focusing on those areas to invest first and now, for the sake of a synergistic approach to optimise the use of antimicrobials and across sectors, and the setting of complementary actions to curb antimicrobial resistance. Dr Javier Yugueros-Marcos, World Health Organisation, France
Dr Javier Yugueros-Marcos, World Health Organisation, FranceJavier Y Marcos joined the World Organization for Animal Health as Head of the AMR & Veterinary Products Department, after more than 20 years of experience in the development and commercialization of diagnostics tests in human and animal health. He leads an international team accountable for the enhanced quality of veterinary products (vaccines, diagnostics and pharmaceuticals), and the coordination of actions supporting a responsible use of antimicrobials worldwide. |
11:30-11:45 |
Discussion
|
11:45-12:15 |
From science to policy: leveraging vaccines to stem global AMR
Abstract not available. Dr Marta Tufet Bayona, GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, Switzerland
Dr Marta Tufet Bayona, GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, SwitzerlandDr Marta Tufet Bayona is the Head of Policy at Gavi, where she leads the Vaccine Investment Strategy and the development of an evidence-based policy framework to guide scope, allocation and programming of Gavi funding. Before joining Gavi she was the Executive Director of the UK Collaborative on Development Research, ensuring strategic coherence across three UK government departments (FCDO, BEIS, DHSC) and research funders of international development (Wellcome, UKRI). She has also led development and implementation of large global health research funding programmes and partnerships whilst working at a range of funders including the Wellcome Trust; The Department of Health and Social Care, UK government; the African Academy of Sciences and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Prior to this she also worked for Nature Reviews Immunology and at the Charles Darwin Research Station in the Galapagos Islands. She is a Trustee of the humanitarian charity ELRHA, Vice Chair of the Galapagos Conservation Trust, and the Chair of the TDR/WHO Scientific Working Group on Capacity Strengthening. Marta holds a PhD in molecular parasitology from Imperial College London. |
12:15-12:30 |
Discussion
|
13:30-14:00 |
The regulatory perspective on AMR vaccines
Dr David Kaslow, Office of Vaccines Research and Review, USA
Dr David Kaslow, Office of Vaccines Research and Review, USADavid C Kaslow, M.D., is director of Office of Vaccines Research and Review (FDA/CBER/OVRR), where he oversees research and regulatory evaluation of vaccines, allergenics, bacteriophage, and live biotherapeutic products. Prior to joining U.S. FDA in October 2022, he served as PATH’s Chief Scientific Officer, supporting PATH’s Drug Innovation and Access Initiative and heading PATH’s Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access (CVIA). His 35+ years of experience in use-inspired research, product development, and product introduction include U.S. government (NIH and FDA), biotech (Vical), multi-national pharma (Merck Research Laboratories), and non-profit (PATH) sectors. He has served on several advisory committees, including WHO’s Product Development of Vaccines Advisory Committee (PDVAC). |
---|---|
14:00-14:15 |
Discussion
|
14:15-14:45 |
Supporting AMR vaccine R&D
Ed Buurman: CARB-X (Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Biopharmaceutical Accelerator; https://carb-x.org/about/overview/) supports the discovery and development of new antibacterial therapeutics and preventatives, as well as diagnostics to allow their development and prudent use. CARB-X funding comes from several governments (US, UK, Germany and Canada) and global health foundations including Wellcome, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Novo Nordisk Foundation. The CARB-X funding model is unique in several ways: (1) it is non-dilutive; (2) it does not take an IP position; (3) it requires a contractual agreement to prepare and follow a Stewardship and Access Plan so that these products reach those who need them most; and (4) it provides a multi-layered support model. The model begins with an internal R&D champion; builds around each project a tailored company support team, comprised of external subject-matter experts representing the breadth and depth of expertise needed to help each team move towards human clinical trials; layers on clinical advisories, portfolio-level customized research tools, and access to free preclinical assays and services; and aids in the pursuit of additional investors and advanced-development partners. Dr Ed Buurman, CARB-X, Boston University, USA
Dr Ed Buurman, CARB-X, Boston University, USAEd spent more than 20 years in large pharma (Pfizer, AstraZeneca) and biotech (Scriptgen/Anadys Pharmaceuticals), focussing on both therapeutic and preventive approaches to infections caused by viruses, bacteria and fungi. Over the years his responsibilities increased from bench scientist to research project lead and alliance director. He earned his PhD in Microbiology at the University of Amsterdam and continued his postdoctoral training at the University of Chicago and University of Aberdeen, UK. |
14:45-15:00 |
Discussion
|
15:00-15:30 |
Break
|
15:30-16:00 |
AMR vaccines: communication and trust
Effective communication of the value of vaccines as tools to combat AMR presupposes that we ourselves have carefully determined their true value. Unfortunately, there is hardly a consensus, even within the medical community, as to what their role might be. On the one hand, vaccines have been essentially ignored in many review articles and editorials about AMR, both in the popular press and the scientific literature, in favor of discussions of potential new antibiotics, bacteriophages, as well as better antimicrobial stewardship, implying their impact is and would be marginal. On the other hand, vaccines in theory are equally effective against antimicrobially-resistant pathogens as they are against sensitive pathogens, as impressively demonstrated by the high effectiveness of typhoid vaccine against extremely drug resistant, epidemic S. typhi in Pakistan. Continued accrual of these types of data, coupled with the knowledge that a panoply of new technologies is being employed to develop vaccines against all sorts of resistant pathogens, could lead to much more sanguine views. Yet this enthusiasm too must be tempered by the knowledge that each vaccine directed against a single pathogen can only prevent the AMR and antimicrobial use associated with that pathogen—and there are many such pathogens, as well as many vaccines already being administered. As vaccines don’t prevent disease, only vaccination does, the tremendous potential value of vaccines against AMR will only be realized if we devise ways to deliver and pay for multiple vaccines identified as public health priorities within a minimal number of separate administrations. Dr Bill Hausdorff, Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, USA
Dr Bill Hausdorff, Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, USAOriginally trained as a biochemist at Johns Hopkins University and the National Institutes of Health, Bill has helped design, evaluate, and catalyse introduction of a wide range of vaccines for over 30 years. His vaccine career started at the US Agency for International Development and Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, followed by two decades at Wyeth Vaccines and at GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines. There Bill worked in Scientific Affairs & Research Strategy, Epidemiology, and as a Vaccine Development Leader, helping to develop the first global pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. For the past 5 years he has been based at the NGO PATH, with an appointment at the Université Libre de Bruxelles. Bill is the author of over 100 scientific articles and book chapters. He currently serves on WHO’s Product Development Vaccine Advisory Committee (PDVAC) and Technical Advisory Group on Vaccines and Antimicrobial Resistance. |
16:00-16:15 |
Discussion
|
16:15-17:00 |
Panel discussion: Setting course to the UN General Assembly on AMR vaccines
|